Marfan Syndrome: A Case Study

 

Mrs. Anitha Victoria Noronha

Assistant Professor, JSS College of Nursing, Saraswathipuram 1st main, Mysore

*Corresponding Author Email:  

 

ABSTRACT:

Background: Marfan syndrome is an autosomal dominant, multisystem connective tissue disease, associated with a mutation in fibrillin, and occasionally a mutation in TGFBR 1 or 2. The cardinal manifestations of this condition involve the cardiovascular, ocular and skeletal systems.

Objective: To describe the features and complications of Marfan syndrome and discuss the current management.

Methods: Detailed history, physical examination and laboratory investigations.

Conclusion: This report underscores the importance of detailed family history and physical examination in the diagnosis of Marfan syndrome. Additionally, good insight about the pathogenesis and the clinical presentation of Marfan syndrome improves the effectiveness of medical therapies which contribute to increasing the survival rate of Marfan patients.

 

KEY WORDS: Marfan, Aortic dissection.

 


INTRODUCTION:

Marfan syndrome is an autosomal dominant, multisystemic connective tissue disease, associated with a mutation in fibrillin, and occasionally a mutation in TGFBR1 or 2.1,2 The cardinal manifestations of this condition involve the cardiovascular, ocular and skeletal systems.3 The prevalence of Marfan syndrome is approximately one per 5000 population4and 26% of the cases have no family history.5,6 Cardiovascular pathology, including aortic root dilatation, and aortic dissection, is the leading cause of death in Marfan patients.4

 

Characteristic clinical features include anterior chest deformities, long fingers, aortic root dilatation and dissection, lens dislocation and myopia. Further less specific features include high arched palate, crowding of the teeth and skin striae.5Medical management may not reverse the features seen, but can reduce the progression and the severity of the symptoms. Beta blockers are considered as the standard therapy, as they work by reducing the aortic shear stress and the heart rate. Diagnosis is mainly done using the Ghent criteria and a detailed clinical examination. Although early diagnosis and refined medical and surgical management have increased median life expectancy from 40 to approximately 70 years.4 individuals with Marfan syndrome continue to suffer important morbidity.

 

Case report:

The patient, Mrs. Bhavya 26-year-old young female, was first seen in Opthalmology OPD at JSS Hospital, Mysore as she was having blurring of vision in her left eye since 12 years. She was diagnosed to have subluxation of lens or superior dislocation of the lens. For further evaluation she was admitted in  Female Medicine ward of JSS Hospital.    

 


 

Fig1 : Subluxation of lens (ectopia lentis)

 

Physical examination revealed her to be a tall woman with extremely long fingers, who appeared much older than her stated age]

 

Fig 2: Patients arm span is greater than her height and her lower segment is longer than her upper segment. Longer extremities (arachnodactaly)

 

 


Blood pressure was 160/100 mmHg, the pulse was 110 beats per minute, with a regular rhythm and a collapsing character. The patient had a temperature of 37.8 and was slightly tachypneic with a respiratory rate if 22 breaths per minute.

 

Closer examination of the hands showed Characteristic Marfan bony changes, in which wrist and thumb signs were noted as well as chest x ray showed mild pectus excavatum.

 

 

Fig 3: A thumb flexed across the palm that extends deyond the ulnar side of the hand suggests hyperextensibility of the small joints

The patient suffered from a high arched palate but no dental abnormalities were present. 

 

Fig 4: High arched palate

 

During Echo a grade four early diastolic murmur was heard over the tricuspid and aortic areas, but it was with a greater intensity over the tricuspid region. S1 and S2 were both audible, however S2 was louder. On percussion and auscultation of the back, right basal crackles were heard with dullness over the right lower lobe of the lung. Examination of the abdomen showed visible pulsation above the umbilicus, and stretch marks. There was no venous distension, organomegaly, cyanosis, or ascites. Peripheral pulses were felt, and no edema was detected in the lower limbs.

 

On systematic review, no abnormalities were found other than the patient’s presenting symptoms, with blurring of vision and some mild joint pain at the knees. Regular tests were first carried out, such as CBC and  X rays.

 

Echo showed a severe aortic regurgitation, a mild mitral prolapse with a minor mitral regurgitation and a trivial pulmonary regurgitation. A severe dilatation of the aorta (6.8 cm) and sinus of valsalva (6.6 cm) with a type (A) dissection flap of the ascending aorta were seen.

 

CT was also done and showed a very large aneurysm affecting the ascending thoracic aorta starting at the level of the aortic valve and terminating just proximal to the arch, measuring approximately 9x7cm in maximum dimension. The dissection was shown to be starting very low at the level of the valve and involving the entire aneurismal aorta, preserving the arch. There was no involvement of the arch or the major vessels arising from the arch. The remainder of the thoracic aorta including the arch, the descending thoracic aorta and also the abdominal aorta were all normal in caliber with no evidence of dissection. The iliac arteries were within normal limits. No CT evidence of aortic rupture was shown. A gross cardiomegaly was also visible.

 

According to patient her father also having the same features, but not consulted any physician.  Mrs. Bhavya is married and having three children. No history of any other medical or surgical illness in her family. As all the symptoms were newly diagnosed patient was not ready accept her condition. After patient and family counseling patient was started with beta blockers and  patient was discharged on 10th day by advising her to come for regular follow-ups.

 

DISCUSSION:

Pathophysiology and Etiology:

Fibrillin is an important component of the microfibrillar system that acts as a scaffold for elastogenisis. Classical Marfan syndrome is associated with a mutation in FBN1, the gene that encodes for fibrillin-1. The pathophysiological outcomes of the degeneration of elastic fibers in Marfan syndrome seem to explain the majority of manifestations of this condition. Stiffness and reduced distensibility of the aorta in response to increased pulse pressure, is the main most important consequence of elastin degeneration.5 Recently, another hypothesis has emerged trying to explain the pathophysiology behind Marfan syndrome. Transforming growth factor β (TGFβ), a cytokine that regulates cell morphogenesis, is thought to contribute to the Marfan syndrome phenotype. Abnormal fibrillin causes failure of the sequestration of the inactive latent precursor of TGFβ, resulting in excessive TGFβ activation, and thus producing the phonotypical manifestations of Marfan’s.4

 

Clinical Presentation:

Marfan syndrome primarily involves the skeletal, ocular and cardiovascular systems. Typically patients with Marfan syndrome present with tall stature, ectopia lentis, aortic root dilatation, and positive family history. This patient presented with all the mentioned symptoms.

 

Management:

The major goal in management of patients with Marfan Syndrome is to prevent life threatening complications through early diagnosis and treatment. While there is no cure for the disorder, careful management can improve the prognosis and lengthen the life span. Ideally,those with Marfan Syndrome should be treated by a physician familiar with the condition and its effects on all body systems.

 

An annual echo is needed to monitor the size and function of the aorta. To reduce stress on the aorta and lower blood pressure β blockers may be appropriate.

 

Although clinical management of genetic disorders is not backed up by extensive clinical trials on humans, numerous studies conducted in vivo managed to establish a direct link between the administration of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and the inhibition of TFGβ signaling.4 Various retrospective studies have assessed the beneficial effects of beta blockers (BB) therapy in Marfan syndrome, and considered it to be the standard of care.All Marfan syndrome patients who can tolerate beta blockers should be treated regardless of the presence or absence of aortic dilatation. No randomized trials reported solid evidence on the use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), however this class of drugs has the theoretical advantage of reducing the ejection impulse and vascular smooth muscle apoptosis which is implicated in cystic medial degeneration.5

 

Annual evaluation of the skeletal system including monitoring abnormal curvatures of the spine and chest are recommended.Initial eye examination with a slit lamp to detect lens dislocation and periodic follow ups are advisable.

 

Recent trials have been aiming to manufacture drugs that are directed at the fibrillin-1 or TGFβ axis to produce the maximum desirable effect.7 Many comparative studies have shown that there is a better outcome with early aortic root surgery than with an emergency or later surgery. Prophylactic surgery is recommended when the diameter at the sinus of Valsalva exceeds 5.5 cm in adults.

Life style adaptations such as avoiding strenuous exercise are necessary to avoid deleterious effects of increased blood pressure on the diseased aorta.

 

CONCLUSION:

Marfan syndrome is the most common inherited connective tissue disorder with diverse clinical manifestations. Although many studies have been conducted which aimed at improving the medical aspect of management, those trials produced conflicting results and generally involved relatively few patients. This report underscores the importance of detailed family history and physical examination in the diagnosis of Marfan syndrome. Additionally, good insight about the pathogenesis and the clinical presentation of Marfan syndrome improve the effectiveness of medical therapies.

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENT:

Many thanks to the patient, Medicine V unit team of JSS hospital and special thanks to the  MSc  Nursing students who were  actively involved in taking care of this patient.

 

REFERENCES:

1.        John C S Dean. Marfan syndrome: clinical diagnosis and management. Eur J Med Genet. 2007 May; 15:724–733

2.        Krause KJ. Marfan syndrome: literature review of mortality studies. J Insur Med. 2000; 32(2):79-88.

3.        Rangasetty UC, Karnath BM. Clinical signs of Marfan syndrome. Hosp physician 2006 April; 42(4):33-38.

4.        Lacro RV, Dietz HC, Wruck LM, Bradley TJ, et al. Rationale and Design of a Randomized Clinical Trial of Beta Blocker Therapy (Atenolol) vs. Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Therapy (Losartan) in Individuals with Marfan Syndrome. Am Heart J. 2007 October; 154(4):624–631.

5.        Dean JC. Management of Marfan syndrome. Heart 2002; 88(1):97–103.

6.        Collod-Béroud G, Boileau C. Marfan syndrome in the third Millennium. Eur J Hum Genet. 2002 November; 10(11):673–681.

7.        Keane MK, Pyeritz RE. Medical Management of Marfan syndrome. Circulation. 2008; 117:2802-13.

 

 

 

 

Received on 30.12.2013          Modified on 01.02.2014

Accepted on 09.02.2014          © A&V Publication all right reserved

Asian J. Nur. Edu. & Research 4(2): April- June 2014; Page 203-206