Mrs. Parneet
Kaur1*, Mr. Prabhjot Singh2
1M.Sc.
Nursing, Mandi Gobindgarh,
Punjab, India.
2Faculty
of Nursing, Desh Bhagat
University, Mandi Gobindgarh,
Punjab, India.
*Corresponding Author Email:
ABSTRACT:
Breast
pain due to nipple sore is one of the most common complaints that health care
provider encounters in breast feeding mothers. The causes of nipple sores are
mainly due to improper techniques of breast feeding, poor breast hygiene and
timing of breast feeding. The aim of the study is to evaluate effectiveness of
Planned Teaching Programme on knowledge regarding
prevention of nipple sore among postnatal mothers. A pre-experimental research
design with purposive sampling and one group pretest post-test was used for the
study. The data was collected utilizing a structured knowledge interview. On
the first day pretest was taken and Planned Teaching Programme
was administered to the group. Post-testwas taken
after 5 days. Data was compiled and analysed by using
Range, mean, median, standard deviation, paired t test and chi square and it
was presented through tables and figures. It was found that more than half i.e.
72% postnatal mothers were having average knowledge and 28% were having poor
knowledge. Effectiveness of Planned Teaching Programme
was evaluated and it was found effective as after this intervention none of the
postnatal mother had poor knowledge score and 26% mother had good knowledge
sore and 74% had average score. The
calculated value of paired ‘t’ test (19.88) is more than table value
(2.01).Statistically it was found that there was an association between the
educational status and knowledge of postnatal mothers.
KEYWORDS: Effectiveness,
Knowledge, Planned Teaching Programme, Nipple sore,
Prevention of nipple sore, Postnatal mothers.
INTRODUCTION:
Many women avoid breast feeding
their newborns simply because they are afraid they will suffer from nipple
sores.1Sore nipple is a condition in which there is a crack across
the nipple or at the base of the nipple or it means any persistent pain in the
nipples that lasts throughout the breastfeeding or hurts between feedings.2
It is a dream for most of the
mothers to have comfort in breastfeeding and nipple sores are common problem,
and pain or cracks frequently occur after breastfeeding.
It is estimated
that 80-90% of breastfeeding women experience nipple soreness, with 26 percent
progress into cracking or intense pain.3
Faulty technique of delatching
is also one of the important causes of nipple sore among lactating mothers.4
Providing
anticipatory guidance to postnatal mothers about the etiology and prevention of
nipple sore may increase the likelihood of initiating and maintaining
breastfeeding. Through the guidance related to prevention of nipple sore, the
incidence of other complications like breast engorgement and mastitis will also
decrease, that result in a healthy mother/ infant relationship and promotion of
breast feeding.5
A sore nipple
associated with breast-feeding is a common problem, with an incidence ranging
from 11% to 90% and may lead to premature weaning. This frequently results from
incorrect positioning at the breast. In addition, sore nipples can readily
become infected with bacteria or yeast, the presence of which can delay
healing, even when positioning and latching on are corrected.6
Coca KP et al (2009) carried out a case control study to
identify causative factors associated with nipple sores in women breastfeeding
exclusively in a maternity unit. The sample was 146 recently-delivered mothers
in rooming-in and were tested daily for a diagnosis of nipple injury,
identified using a magnifying glass. The study concluded that primiparity, poor knowledge about breast feeding techniques
and turgid /or engorged breasts are associated with nipple sores.7
Nipple
sore during the first week of breastfeeding is common. Some studies report
prevalence as high as 96%.8 Sore nipples have been identified as an
important factor in a woman’s decision to discontinue breastfeeding. Preventing
or treating it is important not only to increase individual woman’s comfort but
also to promote breastfeeding generally. Breastfeeding provides significant
health benefits for infants and mothers which is hampered due to nipple sores,
which further lead to breast complications like mastitis and breast
engorgement.9
Nipple sore is the
most common reason for early weaning, surpassed only by the mother’s perception
of insufficient milk supply. In a study of 100 breastfeeding mothers, up to 95%
of women experienced sore nipples during the first week of breastfeeding their
infants, with the majority of those mothers reaching pain ratings of moderate
to intense. The psychological stress of chronic pain associated with nursing
can lead to a disruption in the mother/infant relationship.10
The International
Lactation Consultant Association states that nipple sore is often the result of
ineffective positioning and latch. The group recommends anticipatory guidance
to prevent nipple sore. Additionally, education related to clinical assessment
of the nipple should be provided to rule out other causes, such as bacterial or
fungal infection.11
It is important to
deal with problems faced by mothers during breastfeeding as they may frequently
result in the stoppage of breastfeeding or addition of supplements of animal
milk or commercial infant formula. It is found that nipple soreness has been
reported by 33-96% lactating women.12
An intervention
study on the treatment of sore nipple among 66 primiparous
mothers in Turkey revealed that approximately 65% of the lactating women
experienced sore nipples. Lesions were
found on the areola and nipple during immediate postpartum.13
A study on the
early enhancement of successful breast feeding was undertaken in Sweden. 52
healthy mother infant pairs were referred to the pediatric clinic of Malmo
general hospital because of nursing problems. Observations of nursing behavior
showed that almost all the problems were connected to pain during feeding which
is related to nipple sores.14
The investigator during her clinical posting at postnatal ward observed
that postnatal mothers are not feeding properly to their babies due to pain
during feeding. So
the investigator selected this problem statement to educate the postnatal
mothers on knowledge regarding prevention of nipple sore to reduce the
incidence of nipple sore in GianSagar Medical College
and Hospital.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS:
Research
design:
A pre experimental design and one group pre-test and post testwas used for the study.
Setting
of the study:
The study
was conducted in obstetric ward of GianSagar Medical
College and Hospital, Ram Nagar, Rajpura, Punjab.
Population:
The
population of the study consisted of postnatal mothers admitted in obstetric
ward of GianSagar Medical College and Hospital, Ram
Nagar, Rajpura, Punjab.
Sample size\Sampling technique:
50 postnatal
were selected by purposive sampling technique from postnatal mothers admitted
in obstetric ward of GianSagar Medical College and
Hospital, Ram Nagar, Rajpura, Punjab.
Development and description of the tool
The structured
knowledge interview schedule was used for present study after obtaining
approval from the medical and nursing experts in the field of Obstetrics and
Gynecology. The reliability of the tool was checked by conducting pilot study
on 8 postnatal mothers in GianSagar Medical College and
Hospital and the reliability was found as r = 0.8.
Intervention
Planned teaching programme on prevention of nipple sore.
The Planned Teaching Programme
on prevention of nipple sores was prepared for postnatal mothers. It includes
the detail information about definition, causes and clinical features of nipple sore, measures
for maintenance of breast hygiene, ways of maintenance of proper latching,
demonstration on different positions for breast feeding, other advices and let
down reflex which help in the prevention of nipple sore, timing, duration and
frequency of breast feeding for prevention of nipple sores, signs of correct
and incorrect attachment of newborn to breast, technique of de latching and
complications of nipple sores. Total
duration of Planned Teaching Programme was 30 minutes
and it was administered with the help of charts, flashcards and demonstration
to postnatal mothers.
Data collection procedure
The investigator had obtained written
permission from concerned authorities before data collection. The data was
collected in month of February and March from 25/2/2013 to 23/3/2013. The subjects
were approached individually in the obstetric ward. Purpose of the study was
explained and consent was taken from the subjects. On the first day pretest was
taken and then same day Planned Teaching Programme
was administered. Post test was conducted after 5 days.
RESULTS:
Research
findings were organized under the following sections
Section A:
Analysis of sample characteristics.
Section B: Assessment of knowledge regarding prevention of nipple
sore among postnatal mothers.
Section C:
Effectiveness of planned teaching programme.
Section D:
Association of knowledge regarding prevention of nipple sore among postnatal
mothers with selected demographic variables.
Section – A
Analysis of
sample characteristics
Table 1 Frequency and percentage distribution of sample
characteristics
Socio-
demographic characteristics |
Frequency (f) |
% |
Age (in years) |
||
18-23 |
35 |
70 |
24-29 |
15 |
30 |
Religion |
||
Hindu |
16 |
32 |
Muslim |
1 |
2 |
Christian |
1 |
2 |
Sikh |
32 |
64 |
Type of family |
||
Nuclear |
16 |
32 |
Joint |
33 |
66 |
Extended |
1 |
2 |
Educational status |
||
No formal education |
7 |
14 |
Up to Primary |
17 |
34 |
Up to Secondary |
21 |
42 |
Graduate and above |
5 |
10 |
Occupation |
||
House wife |
43 |
86 |
Self employed |
8 |
4 |
Pvt. Employ |
3 |
6 |
Resident |
||
Urban |
11 |
22 |
Rural
|
39 |
78 |
Source of information |
||
Mass media |
4 |
8 |
Health worker |
12 |
24 |
Family and Friends |
34 |
68 |
Monthly income |
||
<5000 - 10,000 |
17 |
34 |
10,001 – 15,000 |
27 |
54 |
15,001 and above6 12 |
N
= 50
Section – B
Assessment
of knowledge regarding prevention of nipple sore among postnatal mothers.
Table 2.
Range, Mean, Median and Standard Deviation of knowledge regarding prevention of
nipple sore among postnatal mothers. N=50
Variable |
Range |
Mean |
Median |
SD |
Knowledge |
4-17 |
11.58 |
12 |
2.928 |
Table 2
depicts mean knowledge scores of postnatal mothers. The mean knowledge score
was 11.58 with the SD 2.928.
Table 3
Percentage distribution of subjects as per their level of pre-test
knowledge. N=50
Level
of Knowledge |
% |
Poor (0 – 10) |
28% |
Average (11 – 20) |
72% |
Good (21 – 30) |
0% |
Table 3
represents that 28% subjects had poor knowledge followed by 72% who had average
knowledge while none of subjects had good knowledge regarding prevention of
nipple sore.
Fig 1: Bar diagram showing distribution of subjects as per their
level of pretest knowledge.
Fig 1
represents that more than half of the subjects had average knowledge scores
i.e. 72% followed by 28% subjects had poor knowledge regarding prevention of
nipple sore and none possessed good knowledge regarding prevention of nipple
sore.
Section – C
Effectiveness
of Planned Teaching Programme
This
section analyzes the effectiveness of Planned Teaching Programme
on knowledge regarding prevention of nipple sore.
Table 4. Range, Mean, Median and Standard Deviation of pre- test
and post test knowledge scores.
N=50
Test |
Range |
Mean |
Median |
SD |
Pre-test Post-test |
4-17 11 – 25 |
11.58 18.72 |
12 19 |
2.928 3.110 |
Table 4
shows the mean pre- test and posttest knowledge score of postnatal mothers
regarding prevention of nipple sore. The mean score in pre-test was 11.58 with
SD 2.928 and mean post test score was18.72 with SD 3.110.
Fig. 2: Bar diagram showing mean pre-test and post-test knowledge
score of postnatal mothers regarding prevention of nipple sore.
In order to
find out the statistical inference paired t- test was used. The following
hypothesis was stated.
H1:
There is significant difference in the mean pre and posttest knowledge score
regarding prevention of nipple sore among postnatal mothers.
Table 5 Mean, Standard deviation, mean difference and t- test
value of pre-test and post-test knowledge scores. N=50
Assessment |
Mean |
SD |
Mean difference |
t-test |
Pre-test |
11.58 |
2.928 |
7.14 |
19.88* |
Post-test |
18.72 |
3.11 |
*Significant (p<0.05), df-49
Table‘t’
value = 2.01
Table 5
reveals that there was significant difference in mean pre test and post test
knowledge scores of the subjects, moreover there was significant increment in average
post test score i.e. 18.72 with SD 3.110 from the pre test average score of
11.58 with SD 2.928. As the calculated ‘t’ value (19.88) is more than table
value (2.01),so H1 hypothesis was accepted at 5% level of
significance.
Section
D: Association of knowledge regarding prevention of nipple sore among postnatal
mothers with selected demographic variables.
In
order to determine the association between knowledge and demographic variables
chi square test was used and the following hypothesis was stated:
H2:
There is significant association between the knowledge regarding prevention of
nipple sore with selected demographic variables. N=50
Sr. no |
Variable |
Level of knowledge |
Chi square value |
df |
Table value |
Level of significance |
|||
Good |
Average |
Poor |
|||||||
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
Age (in
years) 18-23 24-29 Religion Hindu Muslim Christian Sikh Type of
family Nuclear Joint Extended Educational
status No formal education Up to Primary Up to Secondary Graduate and
above Occupation House
wife Self
employed Pvt.
Employ Resident Urban Rural Source of information Mass media Health worke Family and Friends Monthly income <5000 -
10,000 10,001 – 15,000 15,001 and above |
|
25 11 11 1 1 23 13 22 1 1 12 19 4 31 3 2 8 28 4 9 23 12 20 4 |
10 4 5 0 0 9 3 11 0 6 5 2 1 12 1 1 3 11 0 3 11 5 7 6 |
0.043 0.513 0.776 11.608 |
1 3 2 3 |
3.841 7.815 5.991 7.815 5.991 3.841 5.991 5.991 |
NS NS NS S NS NS NS NS |
|
0.395 0.102 0.625 0.977 |
2 1 2 2 |
||||||||
S- Significant (p<0.05), NS- Non Significant
(p>0.05)
Table
6 shows the computed chi square value of association between the knowledge
regarding prevention of nipple sore with selected demographic variables. The
results revealed that there was significant association found between the
educational status and knowledge regarding prevention of nipple sore. There was
no significant association found with the age, religion, type of family,
occupation, resident, source of information and monthly income. Hence H2 hypothesis
was accepted at 5% level of significance for educational status and rejected in
case of other mentioned socio demographic variables.
DISCUSSION:
The
postnatal mothers had poor knowledge (28%) on different aspects of prevention
of nipple sore. No even a single postnatal mother had
good knowledge prior to the implementation of knowledge intervention in the
form of demonstration and planned teaching programme
whereas the postnatal mothers had good knowledge (26 %) after the intervention
and none of them had poor knowledge regarding all the aspects of prevention of
nipple sore. These findings was supported by Sheety M
who also reported that after attending the this kind of intervention knowledge
and practices of postnatal mothers improved regarding breast feeding problems
and its management as indicated by value i.e. 21.51 was more than the table
value and decrease the chances of breast feeding problems and other
complications.15this intervention is also supported by Percival P
who revealed that educational teaching session on position and attachment of
the baby on the breast had an significant effect on postnatal nipple pain,
nipple trauma and breast feeding duration.16
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Similar study can be conducted with large
sample size to generalize the findings.
2. A similar study can be conducted by true
experimental approach.
3. Comparative study can be conducted among primipara and multipara postnatal
mothers.
4. A follow up study can be conducted to
evaluate the Effectiveness of Planned Teaching Programme.
REFERENCES:
1. Kaur B. Breastfeeding practices of urban, rural women. NNT
Jan 2011; 6(10): 12- 5. Available from : URL:http://
www.rguhs.ac.in/05_N189_29824.doc [Accessed Jan 20 2013]
2. Brent N,
Sherrill JR, Thomas E, Lillian A. Infant feeding. Arch Paediatric
Adolescent Medicine1998; 152:1077-82.Available from: URL: http://
www.rguhs.ac.in/.../05_N076_13729.doc. [Accessed March 05 2012]
3. Melli MS, Rashidi MR, Nokhoodchi A, Tagavi S, Farzadi L, Sadaghat T et al. A randomnized trail of peppermint gel, lanolin ointment and
placebo gel to prevent nipple crack in primiparous
breastfeeding women. MedSciMoint. 2007; 13 (9): 406
-11.
Availablefrom:URL:http://www.mediscimoint.com/fulltxt.php?IDMAN-10163.[Accessed
Jan 20 2013]
4. Sore-cracked-nipples.
Australian Breastfeeding Association. Oct 2011. Available from
https://www.breastfeeding.asn.au/bf-info/common-concerns–mum/sore-cracked-nipples.
[Accessed Nov 25 2012]
5. Tait P. Nipple pain in breastfeeding women: causes,
treatment, and prevention strategies. J Midwifery and Women Health 2000;
45:212-15. Available from: URL: http://www.ncbi.nih.gov/m/pubmed/10907330/.
[Accessed Jan 16 2012]
6. Anitha J. Effectiveness of structured teaching programme about breast feeding techniques on knowledge and
practice in prevention of nipple sore among primipara
mothers.2008 Available from: URL: http:// www.rguhs.ac.in/.../05_N043_4718.doc.
[Accessed Feb 05 2012]
7. Coca KP, Gamba MA, Souza SR, Cristina A, Abrao
FV. Case control study to identify causative factors associated with nipple
sores in women breastfeeding exclusively in a maternity unit. J Pediatr 2009; 85:4. Available from: URL: http://www
http://www.academia.edu/1335125 [Accessed Feb 06 2013]
8. Shialja V, Veen K. Goldentips for breast feeding. The journal of health action 2009; 22:232-34.
9. Page T,
Lockwood C, Guest K. Management of nipple pain and/or trauma
associated with breastfeeding: a systematic review. JBI Rep 2003;
1:127–47. Available from: URL: http: // www. joannabriggslibrary
.org /index. php/ jbisrir/article/view/384
.[Accessed Jan 16 2012]
10. Amir L, Dennerstein L, Garland S, Fisher J, Farish
S. Psychological aspects of nipple pain in lactating women. J PsychosomObstetGynecol 1996; 17(1):53– 8. Available from:
URL: http:// www .libra .msra
.cn/Publication /31673920. [Accessed April 06 2012]
11. Raleigh, NC.
Clinical Guidelines for the Establishment of Exclusive Breastfeeding:
International Lactation Consultant Association.2005 Available from:URL: http://www.guideline.gov/summary/summary.aspx?doc.
[Accessed Oct 05 2012]
12. Riordan J.
Breastfeeding and human lactation. 3rd ed. Jones and Bartlett
Publications; 2005. Available from: URL: http://www.gogglebooks.com [Accessed
April 05 2012]
13. Kusku NK, Koyunchu F. Treatment
of sore nipples. International J gynaecology and
obstetrics 2002; 76:81-2. Available from: URL: http:// www. 119.82.96.8080/…Nur Malathi.pdf/[Accessed April 08 2012]
14. Righard L. Early enhancement of successful breast feeding
in Sweden. World Health Forum 1996; 17(1): 92 -7. Available from: URL:
http://www. ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8820155
[Accessed Feb 22 2012]
15. Sheety M. Effectiveness of planned teaching programme on breast feeding problems and its management
among primigravida postnatal mothers at Manglore. Journal of health action 2009; 22: 35- 8.
16. Percival P.
Whether an antenatal teaching session on position and attachment of the baby on
the breast had an effect on postnatal nipple pain, nipple trauma and breast
feeding duration. 1997 Available from: URL:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9511686 [Accessed Feb 25 2012]
Received on 08.09.2014 Modified on 18.09.2014
Accepted on 25.09.2014 © A&V Publication all right reserved
Asian J. Nur.
Edu. and Research 5(1): Jan.-March 2015; Page 67-71
DOI: 10.5958/2349-2996.2015.00015.4