Nursing
Process and Orlando Process Discipline- A Case Scenario
Sampoornam. W
PhD Scholar, Saveetha
University, Chennai
Corresponding Author
Email: sampoornamwebster@yahoo.in
INTRODUCTION:
Nursing theory is a
conceptualization of some aspect of reality that pertains to nursing. Ida Jean
Orlando was born in 1926. She was one of the first nursing theorists to write
about the nursing process based on her own research (Orlando, I. J. 1972).
DEVELOPMENT OF THEORY:
In the late 1950,
Orlando developed her theory inductively through an empirical study of nursing
practice. From observations she formulated the “Deliberative nursing process
“which was published in 1961.
ASSUMPTION OF THE THEORY:
Distress is the
experience of a patient whose need has not been met. Nursing role is to
discover and meet the patient’s immediate need for help. Patient’s behaviour may not represent the true need. The nurse
validates his/her understanding of the need with the patient. Nursing actions
directly or indirectly provide for the patient’s immediate need. An outcome is
a change in the behavior of the patient indicating either a relief from
distress or an unmet need. Observable verbally and
nonverbally.
CONCEPTS:
Five Major
Interrelated Concepts:
v Functions of professional nursing
v Presenting behaviour
v Immediate reaction
v Nursing process discipline
v Improvement
Functions of
professional nursing organizing principle:
Nursing thought -
Does the patient have an immediate need for help or not? Finding out and
meeting the patient’s immediate needs for help. The purpose of nursing is to
supply the help a patient requires for his needs to be met
Presenting behavior:
To find out the
immediate need for help the nurse must first recognize the situation as
problematic. The presenting behaviour of the patient,
the stimulus causes an automatic internal response in the nurse and the nurse’s
behaviour causes a response in the patient. Two types
of behavior are as follows Verbal behavior: Encompasses patient’s language. It
may take the form of complaints, requests, questions, refusals, demands,
comments or statements. Non verbal behaviour: Physiological manifestations such as heart
rate, perspirations, urinations and motor activity (walking).Vocal behaviour such as sobbing, laughing, shouting and sighing.
Immediate reaction:
Person perceives
with any one of his five sense organs an object. The perceptions stimulate
automatic thought. Each thought stimulates an automatic feeling and the person
acts.
Nurse’s reaction:
Nurse’s reaction comprised of three sequential parts.:
1. First the nurse
perceives the behavior through her senses
2. Second the
perception leads to automatic thought
3. Finally the
thought produces an automatic feeling. Perception, thought and feelings occur
automatically and simultaneously.
Nurse’s action: The
nurse initiates a process of exploration to ascertain how the patient is
affected by what she says or does. The nurse can act in two ways like automatic
action and deliberative action Automatic action: Carrying out the physician
order or regulations that may have no baring
on the patient’s need for help. E.g. Giving sedation
Deliberative action:
Deliberative action is a “disciplined professional response” While all of
nursing actions could be considered to be in the patients best interest or
deliberative.
Deliberative Nursing Action
Fig. 1 The action
process in a person-to-person contact functioning in secret. The perceptions, thoughts and feelings
of each individual are not directly available to the perception of the other
individual through the observation action.
Fig. 2. The cation process in a person-to-person contact functioning by
open disclosure. The perceptions, thoughts and feelings of each
individual are directly available to the perception of the other individual
through the observable action.
Automatic Nursing Action
Nursing process
discipline
Any observation
shared and explored with the patient is immediately useful in ascertaining and
meeting his need. The over-all characteristics of the nursing process and
Orlando’s nurse-patient process discipline are similar. Both processes also
view the patient as a total person. Both processes are used as a method to
provide nursing care and as a mean to evaluate their care. Both require
deliberate intellectual processes. She does not use the term holistic but
effectively describes a holistic approach.
Improvement :
It means to grow
better to turn to profit to use of advantage. In each contact the nurse repeats
a process of learning how to help the individual patient.
Metaparadigm:
Human being – Unique, developmental beings with needs, individuals have their own
subjective perceptions and feelings that may not be observable directly.
Health – Is not well defined but assumed as freedom from mental or physical
discomfort and sense of adequacy or well being.
Environment – Not defined directly but assumed as when there is a nurse patient
contact both nurse and patient perceive, think, feel and act in the immediate
situation.
Nursing – Providing direct assistance to individuals who suffer, for the purpose
of avoiding, relieving, diminishing or curing the person’s sense of
helplessness.
Nursing process and orlando
process discipline:
The over-all
characteristics of the nursing process and Orlando’s nurse-patient process
discipline are similar. Both require deliberate intellectual processes and are
described in a series of sequential steps.
Assessment phase:
The assessment phase
of nursing process corresponds to the sharing of nurse reaction to the
patient’s behavior in orlando’s
nursing process discipline. Patient behavior initiates the assessment. Direct
data are comprised of perception; thought or feeling the nurse has from her own
experience of the patient’s behavior. Indirect data are from sources such as
records, other health team members.
Nursing diagnosis:
Nursing diagnosis is
the product of analysis in the nursing process. Exploration of the nurse’s
reaction with the patient in the orlando’s
process discipline leads to identification of his need for help.
Planning phase:
Involve writing
goals and objectives and deciding upon appropriate nursing actions. This
corresponds to the nurse’s action phase of the orlando’s process discipline. Goal is always relief
of the patient’s need for help. Objectives relates to the improvement in the
patient’s need for help. Both the process requires patient participation in
determining the appropriate action.
IMPLEMENTATION:
Involve the final
selection and carrying out of the planned actions. Part of the nurse’s action
phase of Orlando’s process of discipline. Both processes mandate that the
action be appropriate for the patient’s as a unique individual. Orlando’s
process discipline is concerned only with the effectiveness of the action in
resolving the immediate need for help.
EVALUATION:
Evaluation in both
processes is based on objective criteria. It is inherent in Orlando’s action
phase of process discipline. For an action to be deliberative the nurse must
evaluate its effectiveness.
ORLANDO’S
NURSING PROCESS
Application of orlando’s theory in nursing process:
Case Scenario:
Mrs. J is agitated sitting, awaiting surgery for her carpal tunnel. She
is clutching the blankets, eyes wide and lips pressed firmly together. The
nurse comes to the bedside; she asks if there is anything that she can do to
make Mrs. J feel more comfortable. Mrs. J responds “Nothing, I’m fine!” Now
does the nurse leave her alone after she receives her answer? (Ann Marriner Tomey, Martha Raile Alligood)
Patient behavior:
What the nurse has heard (verbal) as well as seen (non verbal) would
mean that the nurse attempt to meet Mrs. J’s need. What are her needs?
Mrs. J’s Needs: Acknowledgment of feeling out of control. Acknowledgment of the fear of unknown. Education on what is
going to happen in each step of the way. Participation in her
care.
Nurse’s reaction:
“I understand how frightening it can be to be the patient in the bed.
Letting others do things to you. I want you to know that it’s ok to be afraid,
but I’m going to be with you the whole time. Is that how you are feeling?”
Mrs. J’s response “May be a little.”
“I’d like to tell you about what we’re going to do from here, is that
alright with you?”. Nurse’s response
Nurse’s action:
Allow Mrs. J to join in a dialogue about the surgery, sequence of
events, what to expect. Mrs. J is invited to participate in her care.
Validation is given to her feelings as well as input on her ongoing anxiety or
any pain that she may be experiencing. With each step or intervention her
participation is actively pursued and surgery proceeds with her participation.
Improvement (Resolution):
Mrs. J is now sitting up relaxed feeling satisfied that she has overcome
an anxiety that she had been experiencing for days. When asked “How was your
experience?” She responds, “Great! A lot easier than I ever thought it would
be. I’ll be back in six weeks to have my other hand done.”
Assessment:
Direct data: Perception of the nurse includes the anxiety exhibited by
Mrs. J awaiting surgery for her carpal tunnel.
Nursing Diagnosis (Patient Problem):
Acknowledgment of anxiety by Mrs. J
Planning (Goals/ Objectives):
Nurse starts to participate in the care of Mrs. J. The nurse gives
validation to Mrs. J‘s feeling of anxiety or any pain that she may be
experiencing.
Implementation (Selection/Carrying Planned Action):
The nurse explains each step of intervention about the surgery for
carpal tunnel to Mrs. J. Stays with the client and offer reassurance of safety
and security. Encourage the client to explore underlying feelings. Teach the
relaxation technique. Administer tranquilizing medication.
Evaluation:
Mrs. J is relaxed; feeling satisfied that she has overcome an anxiety.
The nurse evaluates the effectiveness of nursing action as evidenced by relief
from anxiety.
Theory critique:
Lack of operational definitions for concepts – limits
development of research hypothesis. Theory is more
congruent in guiding nurse – patient interactions for assessing needs and in
providing nursing therapeutics deemed necessary to patient care. Focus on short
term care, particularly aware and conscious individuals and on the virtual
absence of reference group or family members.
CONCLUSION:
The nurse develops a unique/modifiable tool that applies this theory in
various clinical settings to achieve positive outcomes.
REFERENCE:
1.
Orlando, I. J, (1972) “The discipline
and teaching of nursing process: An evaluative study” New York: G. P. Putnam.
2.
Ann Marriner Tomey, Martha Raile Alligood Nursing Theorists and Their Work Communication:
State of Washington, Office of Supervisor.
3.
George B. Julia Nursing Theories- The
base for professional Nursing Practice, 3rd ed. Norwalk, Appleton & Lange.
4.
Wills M. Evelyn, McEwen Melanie, (2002)
“Theoretical Basis for Nursing” Philadelphia. Lippincott Williams& wilkins.
5.
Meleis Ibrahim Afaf, (1997) “Theoretical Nursing:
Development & Progress” 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Lippincott.
6.
Taylor Carol,Lillis Carol, (2001) “The Art & Science of Nursing Care” 4th ed. Philadelphia, Lippincott.
7.
Potter A Patricia, Perry G Anne, (1992)
“Fundamentals Of Nursing –Concepts Process & Practice” 3rd ed. London Mosby
Year Book.
Received on 13.01.2015 Modified on 13.02.2015
Accepted on 26.02.2015 © A&V Publication all right reserved
Asian
J. Nur. Edu. and Research 5(2): April-June
2015; Page212-216
DOI: 10.5958/2349-2996.2015.00042.7