Mrs.
Veena Rajput
Reader, Shri Shankaracharya
College of Nursing, Bhilai
Corresponding Author Email: 1203veena@gmail.com
INTRODUCTION:
A
desired result of any employee’s behavior is effective job performance. An
important part of behavior manager’s job is to define performance in advanced
and to state desired results. Performance related behaviors are directly
associated with job tasks and need to be accomplished to achieve a job’s
objectives.
An hospital administrator has to have information regarding
the performance of all the personal working in the hospital. Except for the few
top administrative officers(managers). The
administrator will not have direct information of those working in a medium
sized or large sized hospital. There is a need for a system of performance
appraisals.
DEFINITION:
1.
Performance appraisals is the evaluation of work done (quality, quantity, and
the manner it is carried out) during a specified time period against the
background of the total work situation.
2.
Performance appraisals is the planning and record of certain personality and
behavioral characteristics of the individual, effectiveness at the job and
contribution to the achievement of organizational goal.
3.
Performance appraisal is the process of interaction written documentation,
formal interview and follow-up that occurs between managers and their employee
to give feedback, make decision and cover for employment practice law.
4. It is a systematic evaluation of a
individual of respect his or her performance on the job his or her potential
for development
Purpose of performance appraisal:
1. Employee
performance
2. Employed
development
3. Supervisory
understanding
4. Guide to job change
5. Salary and wage
administration
6. Coaching and
counseling
7. Remaining
dissatisfaction
8. Validating
personnel programmer.
Appraisal process:
1. To set standard
based on job analysis.
2. Communicate
standard of job performance.
3. Measure performance
4. Compare performance
to standard
5. Rate the employee
performance
6. Communicate the
rating to the employee
7. Use the appraisal
for decision making and developmental process.
Principles of performance appraisal:
The nurse’s evaluation
should be based on –
1. Behaviorally,
Oriented performance standards for the position that she occupies.
2. Adequate and
representative sample of the individual’s behavior should be observed in
evaluating her performance.
3. The individuals
should be given a copy of job description format standard and evaluation form
4. In documentary
employees performance appraisal the supervisor should indicate this area. In
which performance is satisfactory and these in which improvement are needed.
5. If we want the
improvement in several area then specify which area
are to be given priority.
6. Evaluation
conference should be scheduled at a time convenient for both
Components to be evaluated:
Nurses engage in a
variety of job related activities. To reflect the multidimensional nature of
the job, the performance appraisal form usually requires a nurse manager to
rate several different performance dimensional such as use of the nursing
process, professionalism, safety, continuing education and initiative.
In developing an
appraisal device, an organization can focus on employee trails, results,
behaviors, and or same combination thereof (Bernardin
and Beatly 1984). The specific focus of the form
affects the whole appraisal process.
1. Traits and personal characteristics:
Many appraisal system
focus on personal traits and characteristics such as ability or stability to
handle stress because trait oriented instruments are in expensive to develop
and can be used for a wide variety of position.
2. Results oriented system:
All organization, even
non-profit health care organizations, needs to be concerned with the bottom
line. If the hospital has a 35% occupancy rate or 20% employee absenteeism rate
its future is in jeopardy.
In recent years
therefore top management has turned to appraising same employees at least
partly on results. There are pros and cons to evaluating health care personnel
on such a basis.
3. Behavioral criteria:
Behavior-oriented system
focus on what the employee actually does.
Such as system gives new
employee specific information on how they are expected to behave and is less
likely to lead to legal problems. The behavioral focus facilitates employee
development. The major drawbacks of a behavior-oriented appraisal system are
that it is relatively time consuming and tied to only job or narrow range job.
4. Combining different of criteria:
In such a system each
employee may have a few major objectives, he or she is expected to accomplish.
In addition to being evaluated on whether these results were attained,
individuals are also evaluated in terms of both general personal
characteristics and behaviorally specific criteria.
Formats for appraisal:
Several techniques exist
for appraisal of employees in an organization. Each has its own combination of
strengths and weakness. No one technique by it self
is able to achieve all the purpose for which management institutes the
appraisal program. The choice of a particular technology depends on three major
factors-
1. Utilization
criteria
Why is performance
evaluation being done?
The objective may be for
disciplinary action, feedback for employee development, promotion, selection or
training.
2.
Qualitative criteria
Consideration
of organizational constraints assumptions of the method relevance of evaluation
criteria, data availability, practicality, potential for equilence
and interpretability.
3.
Quantitative criteria
Psychometric property of
the evaluation-reliability, discriminability
accuracy, inherent rating occurs. A technique which is potentially less subjective
and more objectives than another is to preferred.
‘Objective’ is the ability of the format to bring out impartial, reliable and
valid information about the individual.
Method of appraisal
1. Self appraisals-
Employees are
increasingly being asked to submit written summaries or portfolios of their
work related accomplishments and productivity as part of the self appraisal
process.
Portfolios often provide
examples of how the employee has implemented clinical guidelines; patient
outcomes achieved, and sample patient care documentation (Tailor, 2000). The
portfolio also generally includes the employee’s goals and an action plan for
accomplishing these goals.
2. Appraisal by others rating on appraisal by supervisor
· Graphic rating scale
· Rating
· Forced distribution system
o Free writer
o Essay
o Forced choice appraisal
· Critical incidence method
·Field review techniques
· Rating by self and by groups
· Feedback of appraisal information
· Appraisal using performance statistics
· Other method
o MBO
Technology of appraisal
Since the 1920s, many
appraisals tools have been developed. Certain types of tools or renew
techniques have been popular at different times. Since the early 1990s, the
Joint commission an Accreditation of healthcare organization
(JCAHO) has been advocating the use of an employee’s job description as the
standard for performance appraisals.
The following is an over
view of some of the appraisal tools commonly used in health care organization.
1. Traditional rating scale
·
Many
organization use a TRS for all employees in a class (example staff nurse,
clinical nurse specialist) regardless of their specific job setting (example
outpatient surgery, ambulatory clinic)
·
A
traditional rating scale includes-
·
General
performance
·
Equally
weighted dimensions
·
Absolute
judgment standard
·
Judgment
based on supervisor’s idea.
·
In
filling out a traditional rating scale, the appraiser is required to reflect on
the appraisee’ performance over the entire evaluation
period (12months) and rate the individuals against the raters internal standard
of performance.
2. Forced distribution evaluation
This is similar to
grading on a curve. The manager is required to rate employees in a fixed
manner. If the rating scale has five categories Advantages- In that all employees can’t be given average or good
ratings, some rated better than others.
Disadvantages-
i) It is ‘too gross’ doesn’t discriminate
better individuals in a group.
ii) Problem occurs borderline cases.
iii) The scale doesn’t
explain the reason for certain performance gradation and employee doesn’t know
what specifically he must do to improve his performance.
The manager may be
required to spread employees rating equally over the five categories.
Because this technique
is constraining restrict severely
Because of general
dislike of forced distribution system, they are not commonly used.
3. Trait rating scale
A rating scale is a
method of rating a person against a set standard, which may be the job
description, desired behavior, or personal traits. The rating scale is probably
the most widely used of may available appraisal
method.
Rating personal traits
and behavior is the oldest type of rating scale.
There are two types of rating scales mainly used in many
organization
a) Job Dimension Scale
b) Behavior Anchored
Rating Scale
Job dimension scale-
This technique requires
that a rating scale be constructed for each job classification. The rating
factors are taken from the context of the written job description.
Weakness- It focuses on
job requirements rather than ambiguous terms such as ‘quantity of work’.
Behaviorally anchored rating scale-
First developed by Smith
and Kendall for staff nurse in 1963, the BARS assumes the following-
· A person’s effectiveness on the job can be best inferred
from the behavior on the job rather than on personality traits. Evaluation of
behavior is more objectives than judging personality traits.
· The employee’s performance is complex results from several
dimension. The amount or degree of each dimension can
be effectively recorded through statement rather than by mere numerical
gradation.
·During the evaluation process, BARS forces appraisal to
focus on an employee’s actual behavior.
Limitation
1. The process of BARS
construction is time consuming.
2. BARS developed for
one situation can’t be easily used in another situation as the job requirements
may be different in another situation.
4. Checklist
There are several types
of checklist appraisal tools-
a). Weighted scale
b). Forced checklist
c). simple checklist
a). Weighted Scale
It is most frequently
used checklist, is composed of many behavioral statements that represent
desirable job behaviors. Each of these behavior statements has a weighted score
attach to it. Employee receives an overall performance appraisal score based on
behavior or attributes.
b). Forced Checklist
It requires that the
supervisor select an undesirable and a desirable behavior for each employee.
Both desirable and undesirable behavior has quantitative values, and the
employee again ends up with a total score on which certain employment decisions
are made.
c). Simple checklist
It is composed of
numerous words or phrases describing various employee behavior or traits. These
descriptors are often clustered to represent different aspects of one dimension
of behavior, such as assertiveness or interpersonal skill.
Limitation
1). There is no set
performance standard.
2). Specific components
of behavior are not addressed.
5. Essays
The essay appraisal
method is often referred to as the free from review. The appraiser describes in
narrative form an employee’s strength and areas where improvement or growth is
needed.
Although this method can
be unstructured it usually call for certain items to be addressed. This
technique has some strength because it forces the appraisal to focus on
positive aspects of the employee’s performance. However, a greater opportunity
for personal has undoubtedly exists.
6. Peer review:
When
monitoring and assessing work performance are carried out by peers rather than
by supervisors. It is
referred to as peer review. Most likely, the managers
review of the employee is not complete unless some type of peer review. When implemented property, provides the employee with valuable feed back that can promote growth.
Advantage:
It also can provide
learning opportunity for the peer reviews. Taylor(2000)
suggests that peers who work together have a level of insight in to each others clinical practice and that peer review provide them
an opportunity to receive better feedback about self improvement.
Disadvantage:
As evidence by some
university teacher receiving by justified tenure or the failure of physicians
to maintain adequate quality control among some individual’s in the profession.
It involves much risk taking. Time consuming. Requires a
great deal of energy.
7. Performance appraisal interview:
In performance appraisal
interview the nurse manager need to establish that performance has been
carefully assessed that, when merited, rewards will be forthcoming.
Developmental activities
also need to be derived from an accurate evaluation. If an employee is rated on
“needs immediate improvement” on delegation skills, for example-Any effort to
remedy this deficiency must stem from the employee’s acceptance of the need for
improvement in delegation.
The appraisal interview
is most likely to go well if the nurse manager has written and shared critical
incidents throughout the evaluation period. If such feedback has occurred,
staff members go in to the interview with a good idea of how they are likely to
be rated, as well as what behavior led to the rating.
If nurse manager has not
kept notes throughout the year, It is important to recall numerous, specific
examples of behavior, both positive and negative to support the rating given.
Leadership roles associated with performance appraisal:
1). Uses the appraisal
process to motivate employees and promote growth.
2). Uses techniques to
reduce the anxiety inherent in the appraisal process.
3). Uses coaching
techniques that promote employee growth in work performance.
4) Involves employees in
all aspects of performance appraisals.
Management function associated with performance appraisal:
1). Use a formalized
system of performance appraisal.
2). Gathers data for
performance appraisals that are fair and objective.
3). Uses the appraisal
process to determine staff education and training needs.
4). Maintain appropriate
documentation of appraisal process.
Following are recommendation for conducting an appraisal interview:
1). Put the employee at
ease.
2). Cleary state the
purpose of the appraisal interview.
3). Go through the
rating one by one with the employee.
4). Draw out the
employee’s reactions to the rating.
5). Decide on specific
ways in which performance areas can be strengthened.
6). Set a follow-up
data.
7). Express confidence
in the employee.
Appraisal interview difficulties:
a). BEFORE-
i). Make sure that the conditions mentioned
previously have been met.
ii). Select the
appropriate time.
iii) Care the employee 2-3 days advance notice of scheduled appraisal.
iv)
Personally prepare,
mentally and emotionally.
v). Plan a seating
arrangement.
b). DURING-
I). Greet the employee
warmly.
ii) Begin the conference
on a pleasant informal notes.
iii) Avoid surprises.
iv)
Use caching technique.
v). Conduct the
conference in a nondirective manner.
vi)
Focus on employee
performance.
vii)Use
term language which are easily understood.
c). AFTER-
i). Both the
manager and employee need to sign the appraisal form.
ii). End the conference
in a pleasant notes.
iii) Documents the
goals.
iv)
The manager should
develop a method of follow-up to ensure such coaching task place.
Potential appraisal problems:
There
are 3 types of potential appraisal problem-
i) Leniency error
ii)
Regency error
iii)Halo error
Leniency error
The tendency of a manager to overrate staff performance.
Regency error
The
tendency of a manager to rate an employee based an recent events, rather than over the entries
evaluation period.
Halo error
The
failure to differentiate among the various performance dimension
when evaluating.
Conflicts in appraisals:(General problem)
i.
BIAS:
a). Opportunity bias-
Some
employee have better working conditions, supportive supervisors more
experienced co-workers.
b).Group
characteristics bias-
Group cohesiveness morale, group interpretation of fair
day’s work.
c).
Predictor bias-
Appraiser’s knowledge of parts record of an individual.
d).
Individuals prejudices-
Regarding age, sea, religion behavior.
ii . Equivalence:
A
major aim of appraisal is to compare the performance of an individual with that
of his peer. These assumptions enter that all individual being compared were
subject to similar work environments to similar inhibitory and facilitator
falters assumptions that are rarely true. Consequently employees subject to
less competition or to lenient appraisers revive
higher appraisal higher appraisal than equally competent or superior
associates.
iii. Pressure:
From power group unions and superiors to rate the subject
favorable.
The appraiser:
“Who
knows best about an individual’s performance” is an important issue in
appraisal. Equally important is the question whether the person who knows, best
about the individual’s performance is the best person to record this
performance in the light of the organization objectives.
Periodicity of appraisal-
Performance
appraisal is most often conducted as an annual activity, though for trainees
and new recruits, quarterly frequency is usually the norm. Thus employees may
be rated at the same time during the year or an anniversary date of employment
of the respective individuals.
Decision tree for evaluating performance
ASSESS PERFORMANCE |
|||
IS THERE IS PROBLEM |
® |
GIVE FEEDBACK AS |
|
¯ |
|
¯ |
|
YES |
NO |
||
IF THE PROBLEM
IS |
APPROPRIATE |
||
SKILL RELATED |
MOTIVATED RELATED |
|
|
¯ |
¯ |
|
|
·EXPECTATIONS |
·CLARIFY EXPECTATION |
|
|
·.COACH |
·DETERMINE OBSTACLES AND REMOVE THEM |
|
|
·SIMPLY TASK |
·DETERMINE IF DESIRED PERFORMANCE IS BEING |
|
|
· REPLACE IF TIME |
·DETERMINE EMPLOYEE VALUES REGARDING
DOESN’T WARRANT OTHER |
|
|
TECHNIQUES |
REWARD, ENSURE EQUITABLE TREATMENTS |
|
|
Points are to be kept in mind for
appraising fairer and more accurate assessment:
1.
The appraiser should develop an awareness of his own bias
and prejudices.
2.
Consultation should
be sought frequently.
3.
Information should be
gathered appropriately
4.
Information should be
written down and not trusted to memory.
5.
Collected assessment
should contain positive example of growth and development achievement areas
where development is needed.
6.
The appraiser needs
to guard against the three common pitfalls of assessment halo, horn and central
tendency.
7.
Some efforts must be
made to include the employees own appraisal of his other work.
A sound appraisal program must
satisfy the following basic requirement:
1. The system must be consistent with the management style and
philosophy, work technology and socio-cultural characteristics of the
individuals concerned.
2. It should be in tuned with other personnel programs, such as
the system of rewards, compensation scheme training programs etc.
3. The technology in use should have the co-operation of the
appraisals. It should have the ability to assess, in as objective manner as
possible, the performance and effectiveness of an individual’s as related to
his job.
CONCLUSION:
Despite from numerous problems associated with appraisal, most
organization continue to have the formal appraisal
program. It is hence clear that the alternative to a bad appraisal program at
all, but it can and ought to be a batter appraisal program.
REFERANCE:
1.
Bessie
L. Marquis, Carol J. Huston- Leadership Role and Management Function In Nursing Theory And Application. 4rth Edition. Lippincott
William and Wilkins Philadelphia. PP 467-492.
2.
B.T Basavanthappa- Nursing Administration. 1st
Edition, Jaypee brothers
medical publishers (P) Ltd. New Delhi PP 425-429.
3.
C.M. Francis
Mario C Desouza- Hospital Administration. 3rd
Edition. Jaypee brothers
medical publishers (P) LTD. New Delhi PP 221-223.
4.
Eleanor
J. Sullivan, Philip J. Decker- Effective Leadership Management Nursing. 6th
Edition. Pearson Prentice hall upper saddle river New Jercy.
PP 281-288
5.
P. V. Samuel,
A. P Sathe- Epidemiology And
Management For Health Care For All. 2nd Edition. Popular Prakashan Mumbai PP 189-197
Received on 11.08.2014 Modified on 24.09.2014
Accepted on 08.10.2014 © A&V Publication all right reserved
Asian J. Nur. Edu. and Research 5(2): April-June 2015;
Page 287-292
DOI: 10.5958/2349-2996.2015.00057.9