Relationship between Chaos Theory and God's Laws in Florence Nightingale's
Philosophy
Hideaki Yanagisawa
Konosu Public Health Center, 4-5-10, Higashi, Konosu, Saitama, 3650039, Japan
*Corresponding Author Email: science2001007@ybb.ne.jp
ABSTRACT:
Florence
Nightingale claimed to have heard the call from God several times, and although
she troubled herself with various problems at the time of each calling, she was
always drawn to what she called God's laws. She frequently referred to God's
laws in her Suggestions for Thought, which was a three-volume work that
presented her radical spiritual views for those who had turned away from
conventional religion. The relationship between God's
calls, God's laws, andher
philosophy are explained by chaos theory.
Organizing thoughts in Florence
Nightingale is compared with fixed state and chaotic state in a chaos equation.
Since Edward Norton Lorenz recognized chaos theory in 1961, she never formally
understood it. However, she did intuitively understand some aspects of chaos
phenomena through her personal experiences.
In regard to
the organization of Nightingale's thoughts, God's calls can be explained as a
process of decreased entropy beyond the Feigenbaum
point.
KEYWORDS: Feigenbaum point, entropy, chaos, Florence
Nightingale, organizing thought
INTRODUCTION:
Florence
Nightingale (1820–1910) claimed to have heard the call from God several times,
and although she troubled herself with various problems at the time of each
calling, she was always drawn to what she called God's laws. In fact,
she frequently referred to God's laws in her Suggestions for Thought,
which was a three-volume work that presented her radical spiritual views for
those who had turned away from conventional religion1. Conversely,
her work raises the following question: Did she attempt to explain the
existence of God by mentioning God's laws? In the title of her work, the
expression Suggestions for Thought can be either scientific or
philosophical. However, in this case, it is suspected that she attempted to
explain science-based instead of God-based laws. Therefore, this paper examines
the relationship between God's calls, God's laws, and Nightingale's philosophy2,3 as explained by chaos theory.
The approach
for this explanation is twofold. First, the organization of Nightingale's
thoughts and God's calls are explained as a process of decreasing entropy4
beyond the Feigenbaum point2,3,5.
Second, the relationship between chaos theory and Nightingale's in-depth
philosophy is explained. Since Edward Norton Lorenz recognized chaos theory in
1961, more than 50 years after Nightingale's death, she never formally
understood it. However, she did intuitively understand some aspects of chaos
phenomena through her personal experiences and attempted to scientifically
explain God's laws.
METHODS:
Explanation
of the Chaos Theory
Definition
of chaos theory
Explanation
of chaos equation and definition of chaos theory were reported3,6. "Definition of chaos theory",
"Relationship of continuous covariation to chaos
theory", "Relationship of Entropy to Chaos Theory", "Relationship
of Entropy to Thermodynamics" and "Relationship of Entropy to
Thinking" in it is outlined below.
Relationship
of continuous covariation to chaos theory
A
representative chaos equation is given as
In this
case, Equation 1 means the same as Equations 2 and 3:
Since the calculations in Equations 2 and 3
are alternately repeated, the solutions for Z(n)
and Y (n) are in an ordered spiral chaos state. According to
Equation 1, as Y (n) is determined, Y (n + 1) changes. However,
once Y (n + 1) replaces Y (n) in Equation 1, Y(n
+ 2) changes. Thus, Y (n) is unable to settle into its original
pre-chaos value. This relationship means that once a variable transforms into
another, it becomes unable to settle into its original value or, as defined
above, a correlated variable relationship that is equivalent to covariation. Hence, the relationship between Y (n)
and Y (n + 1) in Equation 1 is covariation,
and this relationship must continue to sustain the chaotic state. If no
correlated variable relationship exists between the variables, then a chaotic
state cannot be confirmed. There are complete and converging fixed states, localized and expanded chaotic states, and random
states, mathematically. Converging process is not required in complete fixed
state.
Continuous covariation
being correlated variable is required for the occurrence of converging fixed
and chaotic phenomena7, and complete fixed or randomness answers are
produced without covariation. Parts F, G, and H
represent converging fixed, localized chaotic, and expanded chaotic states in
Figure 1. Each the vertical axis and the horizontal axis are equivalent to
"Y (n)" and "p" in Equation 1. An arrow is the Feigenbaum's point5.
Relationship of Entropy to Chaos Theory
In
statistical mechanics, entropy is a random function that includes no absolute
direction. As seen in Figure 1, increasing entropy is equal to the direction
from Parts F to H, while decreasing entropy represents an anti-random state,
which is equal to the direction from Parts H to F. Each direction is decided by
the value of "p" in Equation 1.
Figure
1. A schema of fixed and chaotic states in chaos theory.
Parts
F, G, and H represent converging fixed, localized chaotic, and expanded chaotic
states. The arrow is the Feigenbaum point.
Relationship of Entropy to Thermodynamics
According to Styer4, entropy
(the second law of thermodynamics) never decreases for isolated systems. In
addition, many scientists incorrectly believe that the law of increasing
entropy is indicated in all energies; thermal energy is not equal in all
energies. Thermal energy is the energy a substance or system includes in
relation to its temperature, i.e., the energy involved in moving molecules.
Therefore, the second law of thermodynamics may not indicate energy without
matter.
In fact, there is no phenomenon that
includes increasing entropy between two different electromagnetic waves. In
addition, when there is no movement of matter, the increase of entropy becomes
non-absolute. The cause of increasing entropy can only be explained through the
directional force of gravity, and in energy without matter, entropy may be
constant7,8.
Relationship of Entropy to Thinking
The process from the chaotic to the fixed
state includes the methods of rearranging thoughts. In addition, the
information randomly collected is unified into one thought by these processes;
There are a number of methods of organizing thoughts, such as the SEIQoL-DW (Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual
Quality of Life-Direct Weighting) method, the KawakidaJiro
(KJ) method, Theoretical Substruction, Mind Mapping,
Counseling, and Dialectics. The relationship of the chaos equation to the SEIQoL-DW method6, the KJ method9 and
Counseling method10 can be explained as the direction from Parts H
to F, as seen in Figure 1.
Relationship of God to Florence Nightingale
Relationship of decreasing entropy to God’s
calls in Nightingale
Nightingale had heard calls from God four
times11. Nightingale believed she heard her first calling from God
on February 7, 1837. At the time, she questioned the purpose of her life in the
upper classes and pondered about the need for charity and the causes of poverty
and unemployment. Seven years later, she decided to become a nurse. Because her
parents were opposed to the idea of her becoming a nurse, she was troubled.
Nightingale heard the second call from God
in 1851. Her father, familiar with her way of thinking, allowed her to train as
a nurse. She was troubled about many problems while nursing at the military
hospital during the Crimean War in 1854, when she heard the third call from God.
She could believe her environmental theory by this call. Nightingale was a
health consultant to the United States Army health during the American Civil
War in 1861. She was bedridden due to an illness, which prevented her from
continuing her work as a nurse.
Because she had to consult with no nursing
practice, she might trouble herself. She heard the fourth call from God in 1861
and never stopped campaigning to improve health standards. She heard the four
calls from God when she was troubled and in a chaotic state. And she was always
drawn to what she called God's laws by their calls.
The calls she heard can be explained as a
process of decreasing entropy beyond the Feigenbaum
point. It is equivalent to a direction from Part H to Part F in Figure 1. Thus,
the calls from God in Nightingale may be explained by the chaos theory.
Relationship of decreasing entropy to God’s
laws in Nightingale
God's laws were used in Suggestions for Thought by Florence Nightingale1.
By suggestions for thought, she means a method to organize thoughts from a
chaotic to fixed state, not as a continuous chaotic state or to a more chaotic
one. Because chaos theory was recognized in 1961, after her death, by Edward
Norton Lorenz12, she was never aware of a scientific term for this
organizing phenomenon. Therefore, it is thought that she used God's law
to explain a process of this phenomenon.
Relationship of God's laws to God’s calls
for Nightingale
Nightingale's mention of God's calls and
God's laws both demonstrate decreasing entropy. This means that her thought
changed from a God-based to science-based expression. She might have desired to
share her perspective on the scientific process of God's laws, but without
actual knowledge of entropy or chaos theory, she could only intuitively mention
such aspects. In this case, it can be suggested that Nightingale believed in
God's law of thought instead of God himself.
Relationship of chaos theory to God for
Nightingale
For Nightingale, both God’s calls and laws
can be explained as a process of decreasing entropy beyond the Feigenbaum point13. In addition, decreasing
entropy can be explained by chaos theory as the direction from Parts H to F in
Figure 1. Therefore, Nightingale's idea of God can be explained by chaos
theory.
Relationship of Chaos Theory to
Nightingale's Philosophy
Chaos theory had never been reported during
Nightingale's life. However, she could have experienced various chaos phenomena
in her lifetime, but to understand such a theoretical method would have forced
her to subconsciously organize her thoughts. According to this hypothesis, her idea of God's laws becomes equal to chaos theory and correspond
with God's calls in her philosophy.
RESULTS:
Continuous covariation is required in
chaos phenomena, and both increasing and decreasing entropy can be explained by
chaos theory. For increasing entropy in the second law of thermodynamics, there
exists only the force of gravitation on mass. In regard to decreasing entropy,
the phenomena exist for thinking with no mass. Nightingale's circumstantial
experience with chaos phenomena would have developed her personal philosophy.
Therefore, it can be suggested that she indirectly understood chaos phenomena
through her personal experiences.
However, although she troubled herself with various problems at
the time of each calling from God, she was always drawn to what she called
God's laws. In addition, she might have subconsciously expressed scientific law
as God's laws. Therefore, God's laws and calls for Nightingale may be explained
by chaos theory.
DISCUSSION:
As a medical doctor who has treated many
patients, this author discovered a difference between physical phenomena with
mass and living phenomena. If the second law of thermodynamics is absolute,
then entropy always increases4. However, it is an increasing cause
in which there is only the force of gravitation with mass. In addition, three
aspects should be noted: 1) Repulsive force does not exist in gravitation, 2)
fever is a phenomenon that expresses the movement of mass, and 3)
thermodynamics are also laws that express the movement of mass. Therefore, the
second law of thermodynamics is not an absolute law for phenomena such as
thinking without mass.
Entropy that is used in statistical
mechanics has no relationship to the direction of time. However, increasing
entropy is understood as a so-called arrow of time in the second law of
thermodynamics. Therefore, this author hypothesizes that the second law of
thermodynamics cannot be adapted to phenomena without mass2,7 and, according to it, entropy can decrease in such
phenomena. Thus, decreasing entropy is a direction from a chaotic state to a
fixed state, as seen in Figure 1. Organizing thoughts in living phenomena is
equivalent to decreasing entropy.
Florence Nightingale could not know chaos
theory. However, although she troubled herself with various problems at the
time of each calling from God, she was always drawn to what she called God's
laws. It is equivalent to her organizing thoughts. Nightingale's circumstantial
experience with chaos phenomena would have developed her personal philosophy.
Therefore, it can be suggested that she indirectly understood chaos phenomena
through her personal experiences. The dialectical method's relationship with
chaos theory has already been reported14, and this author is
submitting the relation of the chaos equation to dialectics. Philosophy may be
explained by chaos theory.
A difference between a fixed point and
chaotic state is given by changing "p" of Equation 1. Organizing thoughts
is explained as changing "p" or "n" of Equation 1. Of
course, it means that a law of organizing thoughts is explained as the
character of some variables in the chaos equation. In many chaos equations,
there is a variable such as "p" changing the state beyond a Feigenbaum point. "n"
related to continuous covariation does not change the
state beyond Feigenbaum point. Each "p" and
"n" of Equation 1 is equivalent to human's thought and time. Many
calculations such as "n" are equal to his experiences or time. The
thought changing "p" can be attained only with repeated rearrangement
of personal experience.
Because Nightingale did not know a word
"chaos", she might have subconsciously expressed scientific law as
"God's laws." It is a process of decreased entropy beyond the Feigenbaum point.
REFERENCES:
1.
McDonald, L. Florence Nightingale's
Suggestions for Thought: Collected Works of Florence Nightingale. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier Univ. Press. 2008; pp. 794.
2. Yanagisawa,
H. Relation of the chaos equation to God Perceived by Pascal, Nietzsche and
Nightingale. Scientific GOD Journal.
3(2); 2012: 207-212.
3. Yanagisawa,
H. Association of Evolutionary Topics related to God and Chaos Theory. General
Science Journal. 2015; Available from: http://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/
Research%20Papers-Unification%20Theories/Download/5889
4. Styer, D.F. Entropy
and evolution. American Journal of Physics.
76; 2008:1031–1033.
5. Feigenbaum, M.J. Quantitative universality for a class of
nonlinear transformations. Journal of Statistical Physics. 19(1); 1978: 25–52.
6. Yanagisawa,
H. Relation of Chaos Equation to the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual
Quality of Life-Direct Weighting method, Mediterranean Journal of Clinical
Psychology. 2(2); 2014: 1-10.
7. Yanagisawa, H. Contradiction and Development of Modern Science –
Beyond Chaos Theory. Tokyo: Kirishobo Co. 1996;
pp.115-123. (in Japanese)
8. Yanagisawa,
H. Relation of evolutionary theory to second law of thermodynamics (Part 2) -
Relation of chaos theory to corrected second law of thermodynamics-. European
Journal of Scientific Research, 53(1); 2011: 84–86.
9.
Yanagisawa, H. Comparison of Public
Health Nurse's action to chaos equation (community diagnosis = using the KJ
method to community). Japanese Journal of Community Health
Care. 42 (11); 2010: 56-63. (in
Japanese)
10.
Yanagisawa, H. Discovering Equations in
Relation to the Counseling Process. Mediterranean Journal
of Clinical Psychology. 3(1); 2015: 1-19.
11.
McDonald, L. Florence Nightingale:
Passionate Statistician. Journal of Holistic Nursing.16(2);
1998: 267–277.
12. Lorenz, E. N. Deterministic non-periodic
flow. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences.
20(2); 1963: 130–142.
13. Yanagisawa, H. Relation of the chaos equation
to God Perceived by Pascal, Nietzsche and Nightingale. Scientific
GOD Journal. 3 (2); 2012: 207-212.
14. Gilgen, A.R. Common prescriptions for psychology derived
from dialectical materialism and chaos theory. Psychology
Reports. 86(2); 2000: 482-492.
Received on 14.07.2015 Modified
on 28.08.2015
Accepted on 05.10.2015
© A&V Publications all right reserved
Asian J. Nur. Edu. and Research 6(1): Jan.- Mar.2016; Page 81-84
DOI:
10.5958/2349-2996.2016.00017.3