Watershed Stroke
Dr. V. Selvanayaki1, Mrs. K. Sasikala2
1Research Supervisor, VMRF (DU), Salem
2Ph.D Scholar, VMRF (DU), Salem.
*Corresponding Author Email: souganthika@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Watershed infarcts (WI) evolve in hemodynamic risk zones. Clinical picture of WI can be associated to partial epileptic seizures. Diffusion weighted brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows a clear diagnosis. WI pathogenesis involves either embolic or hemodynamic mechanism. A 69-year old patient presented with sub-acute occurrence of right hemiparesis and partial epileptic seizures of the right arm. Carotid ultrasounds demonstrated occlusion of the right extra-cranial internal carotid artery (ICA) and tight stenosis of the contralateral ICA. Brain Diffusion-Weighted magnetic resonance revealed acute ischemic lesions within the watershed area of the left hemisphere. Our case supports the hypothesis of impaired washout of emboli in low-perfusion brain areas as the mechanism underlying cortical WI.
KEYWORDS: watershed infarct, carotid atherosclerosis, carotid ultrasounds, Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance. Cortical watershed strokes (CWS)
INTRODUCTION:
Case history:
A 59 yr old male presented in January 2020 with one day history of right upper and lower limb weakness, giddiness followed by weakness. he is a known case of hypertension 5 years on tab. amlong 5mg. The patient was subjected to basic investigations CBC, electrolytes echo, chest x ray, MRI which reveals elevation of cholesterol, random blood sugar, and lymphocyte count was low, acute infarct in the left high parietal lobe with blurring of grey white function, acute infarction in the left arteries and posterior watershed territories. He was treated with antibiotics, anticoagulants, brain cell stimulator, lipid lowering agent. He ends up with global aphasia on speech therapy.
Watershed strokes are named because they affect the distal watershed areas of the brain. The original terminology came from the German literature, which used the analogy of an irrigation system. The German scholars compared the blood flow in distal arterial territories of the brain to the last field on a farm, which was the area with the least supply of water and therefore most vulnerable to any reduction in flow.[9] In a medical context, the term "watershed" refers to those areas of the brain that receive dual blood supply from the branching ends of two large arteries.[9]
A watershed stroke is defined as a brain ischemia that is localized to the vulnerable border zones between the tissues supplied by the anterior, posterior and middle cerebral arteries.[1] The actual blood stream blockage/restriction site can be located far away from the infarcts. Watershed locations are those border-zone regions in the brain supplied by the major cerebral arterieswhere blood supply is decreased. Watershed strokes are a concern because they comprise approximately 10% of all ischemic stroke cases.[2] The watershed zones themselves are particularly susceptible to infarction from global ischemia as the distal nature of the vasculature predisposes these areas to be most sensitive to profound hypoperfusion.
Signs and symptoms:
Watershed stroke symptoms are due to the reduced blood flow to all parts of the body, specifically the brain, thus leading to brain damage. Initial symptoms, as promoted by the American Stroke Association, are
FAST (stroke), representing
F = Facial weakness (droop),
A = Arm weakness (drift),
S = Speech difficulty (slur), and
T = Time to act (priority of intervention).[4]
All strokes are considered a medical emergency. Any one of these symptoms, whether seen alone or in combination, should be assumed to be stroke until proven otherwise. Emergency medical help should be sought immediately if any or all of these symptoms are seen or experienced. Early diagnosis and timely medical intervention can drastically reduce the severity of a stroke, limit damage to the brain, improve the chances of a full recovery and reduce recovery times massively.
After the initial stroke, other symptoms depend on the area of the brain affected. If one of the three central nervous system pathways is affected, symptoms can include numbness, reduced sensation, and hyperreflexia.
Most often, the side of the brain damaged results in body defects on the opposite side. Since the cranial nerves originate from the brainstem, damage to this area can lead to defects in the function of these nerves. Symptoms can include altered breathing, problems with balance, drooping of eyelids, and decreased sensation in the face.[5]
Damage to the cerebral cortex may lead to aphasia or confusion and damage to the cerebellum may lead to lack of motor movement.[5]
Stroke presentations which are particularly suggestive of a watershed stroke include bilateral visual loss, stupor, and weakness of the proximal limbs, sparing the face, hands and feet.
Causes:
· Congestive heart failure, which can lead to an inability to pump sufficient amounts of blood to the brain
· Atherosclerosis, which can cause a buildup of cholesterol plaques in the blood vessels, thereby decreasing the volume of blood that can flow through the vessel and reach the brain[3]
· Angiopathy, a disease of the blood vessels[6]
· Arterial hypotension, or low blood pressure in the arteries[2]
· Hypertension, or high blood pressure[7]
· Hyperlipidemia, or excessive cholesterol buildup in the blood vessels[7]
· Diseases such as sickle cell anemia, which can lead to deformed red blood cells clogging blood vessels and impeding blood flow[8]
· Carotid artery stenosis, or narrowing of the carotid artery which can decrease the volume of blood flow to the brain[7]
These events are localized to two primary regions of the brain:
1. Cortical watershed strokes (CWS), or outer brain infarcts, are located between the cortical territories of the anterior cerebral artery(ACA), middle cerebral artery (MCA), and posterior cerebral artery (PCA).[3]
2. Internal watershed strokes (IWS), or subcortical brain infarcts, are located in the white matter along and slightly above the lateral ventricle, between the deep and the superficial arterial systems of the MCA, or between the superficial systems of the MCA and ACA.[3]
Classification systems:
· The Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project classification (OCSP, also known as the Bamford or Oxford classification) relies primarily on the patient's initial symptoms. Based on the extent of the symptoms, the stroke episode is classified as total anterior circulation infarct (TACI), partial anterior circulation infarct (PACI), lacunar infarct (LACI) or posterior circulation infarct (POCI). These four entities predict the extent of the stroke, the area of the brain affected, the underlying cause, and the prognosis.[11][12]
· The TOAST (Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment) classification is based on clinical symptoms as well as results of further investigations. In this diagnostic system, a stroke is classified as being due to
1. Thrombosis or embolism due to atherosclerosis of a large artery
2. Embolism of cardiac origin
3. Occlusion of a small blood vessel[13]
Treatment:
Carotid endarterectomy:
Often considered one of the safest ways to treat symptomatic carotid stenosis, carotid endarterectomy is a procedure by which a surgeon gently removes atherosclerotic plaque. Blood flow hopefully then returns to normal, increasing oxygen concentration to normal amounts in watershed areas of the brain.
There is the potential for complications, including disturbing portions of the plaque leading to a stroke or heart attack during or after surgery. Small risks of bleeding and infection exist as well.[14]
Percutaneous treatments of carotid stenosis:
In this type of procedure, a narrowed blood vessel is expanded via angioplasty or stenting. A thin angiography catheter is inserted in a large groin blood vessel and advanced to the stenosis. Percutaneous treatment is less invasive than endarterectomy, usually requiring only local anesthesia. Endarterectomy is still considered safer though, as percutaneous treatments can lead to accidental dislodging of plaque or even arterial rupturing.[14]
Carotid angioplasty:
During carotid angioplasty, an angiography cather with a small deflated balloon attached on the tip is advanced to a carotid stenosis. The ballon is then inflated slowly, forcing the narrowed portion of the vessel to expand.
Carotid stenting:
Carotid stenting follows a similar procedure. Rather than using a balloon, a stent (metal mesh-like tube) is placed over the atherosclerotic plaque in the hopes of stabilizing it and allowing for increased blood flow to watershed portions of the brain.
Prognosis:
Watershed strokes are seldom fatal, but they can lead to neuromuscular degeneration, as well as dementia.[3] This degeneration at the watershed regions of the brain can lead to difficulties with movement and motor coordination, as well as speech. Long-term care is focused around three areas: rehabilitative therapy, surgical interventions, and prevention of future watershed strokes.
Rehabilitative therapies:
Long-term rehabilitative therapy for watershed stroke patients involves physical, occupational, and speech and language therapies. Physical therapy can be used to enhance motor function in the legs and arms that has been impacted by stroke.[15] Occupational therapies can be provided to help to alleviate cognitive impairments that result from watershed stroke,[16] as well as to improve fine motor function that was damaged as a result of the stroke.[17] Stroke can also cause impairments in speech production secondary to neurocognitive and neuromuscular impairments, and therefore speech and language therapies are often a component of long-term care for stroke patients. Intensive speech and language therapy has been shown to improve speech deficits associated with aphasia resulting from stroke.[18]
Surgical interventions:
Endovascular interventions, including surgical revascularization, can increase blood flow in the area of the stroke, thereby decreasing the likelihood that insufficient blood flow to the watershed regions of the brain will result in subsequent strokes.[14] Neuroscientists are currently researching stem cell transplantation therapies to improve recovery of cebreral tissue in affected areas of the brain post-stroke. Should this intervention be proven effective, it will greatly increase the number of neurons in the brain that can recover from a stroke.[19]
Prevention of future strokes:
There are several interventions that are often used to help prevent the recurrence of a watershed stroke; namely, nutritional interventions, as well as antiplatelet, anticoagulant, and statin drug use. Nutritional interventions, including increased consumption of certain amino acids, antioxidants, B-group vitamins, and zinc, have been shown to increase the recovery of neurocognitive function after a stroke.[20] Antiplatelet drugs, such as aspirin, as well as anticoagulants, are used to help prevent blood clots and therefore embolisms, which can cause watershed strokes. Statin drugs are also used to control hyperlipidemia, another risk factor for watershed stroke.
Research:
Stem cell transplantation:
Ischemic stroke is still a major health concern and studies are being conducted to determine the pathway in which brain damage occurs to identify targets for intervention. Stem cell transplantation may help in intervention to improve cell recovery and regeneration.[19]
Strokes after cardiac surgery:
Although the mechanism is not entirely understood, the likelihood of a watershed stroke increases after cardiac surgery. An experiment conducted in a five-year span studied the diagnosis, etiology, and outcome of these postoperative strokes. It was observed that intraoperative decrease in blood pressure may lead to these strokes and patients who have undergone aortic procedures are more likely to have bilateral watershed infarcts. Furthermore, bilateral watershed strokes are associated with poor short-term outcomes and are most reliably observed by diffusion-weighted imaging MRI. Thus, future clinical research and practice should focus on the identification of bilateral stroke characteristics. This identification can help discover affected areas and increase correct diagnosis.[21]
Deep watershed infarcts:
Hemodynamic impairment is thought to be the cause of deep watershed infarcts, characterized by a rosary-like pattern. However new studies have shown that microembolism might also contribute to the development of deep watershed infarcts. The dual contribution of hemodynamic impairment and microembolism would result in different treatment for patients with these specific infarcts.[22]
Basilar artery (BA) stenting:
While intracranial artery stenting is used for same side stroke prevention, basilar artery stenting may help to improve parallel, accessory blood flow. The stent may also lead to termination of recurrent middle cerebral artery (MCA) strokes.[23]
Penumbra imaging:
The area around the damaged ischemia is known as the penumbra. This viable area has the ability to regenerate with the help of pharmacological treatment however most patients with penumbra are left untreated. New research is being conducted in metabolic suppression, direct energy delivery, and selective drug delivery to help salvage this area of the brain after a stroke.[24]
CLEVSRKNC peptide:
This new drug has been shown to home to ischemic stroke tissue as well as apoptotic neuronal cells of the penumbra region. This discovery may help in creating selective drug delivery for stroke patients.[25]
Liposomal drug delivery:
Nanoliposomes are currently being researched for specific drug delivery due to their ph-sensitive and high blood-brain barrier diffusion characteristics. Many advantages of these drugs include:
Due to the fact that acidic environment and low blood flow are prominent characteristic of the penumbra area, liposomal drugs seem to be well suited.[24]
REFERENCES:
1. Porth, C.M. (2009). Pathophysiology: Concepts of Altered Health States (Eighth Edition). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. p. 1301. ISBN 978-16054-7390-1.
2. Torvik, A. (1984). "The pathogenesis of watershed infarcts in the brain". Stroke. 15 (2): 221–3. doi:10.1161 /01.STR.15.2.221. PMID 6701929.
3. Momjian-Mayor, I; Baron, J.C. (2005). "The Pathophysiology of Watershed Infarction in Internal Carotid Artery Disease: Review of Cerebral Perfusion Studies". Stroke. 36 (3): 567–77. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000155727. 82242. e1. PMID 15692123.
4. Harbison, J.; Massey, A.; Barnett, L.; Hodge, D.; Ford, G. A. (1999). "Rapid ambulance protocol for acute stroke". The Lancet. 353 (9168): 1935. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)00966-6. PMID 10371574.
5. Martini, F, Nath, J, Bartholomew, E 2012. "Fundamentals of Anatomy and Physiology.", p. 742-43. Pearson Education Inc, San Francisco. ISBN 9780321709332.
6. Miklossy, J. (2003). "Cerebral hypoperfusion induces cortical watershed microinfarcts which may further aggravate cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease". Neurological Research. 25 (6): 605–10. doi:10.1179/016164103101202048. PMID 14503014.
7. Donnan, G.A.; Fisher, M; MacLeod, M.; Davis, S. M. (2008). "Stroke". The Lancet. 371 (9624): 1612–23. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60694-7. PMID 18468545.
8. Verduzco, L. A.; Nathan, D. G. (2009). "Sickle cell disease and stroke". Blood. 114 (25): 5117–25. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-05-220921. PMID 19797523.
9. Bladin, C. F.; Chambers, B. R.; Donnan, G. A. (1993). "Confusing stroke terminology: Watershed or borderzone infarction?". Stroke. 24 (3): 477–8. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.24.3.477. PMID 8446987.
10. Grotta, JC; Alexandrov, AV (2001). "Preventing stroke: Is preventing microemboli enough?". Circulation. 103 (19): 2321–2. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.103.19.2321. PMID 11352876.
11. Bamford, J.; Sandercock, P.; Dennis, M.; Warlow, C.; Burn, J. (1991). "Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction". The Lancet. 337(8756): 1521–6. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)93206-O. PMID 1675378. Later publications distinguish between "syndrome" and "infarct", based on evidence from imaging. "Syndrome" may be replaced by "hemorrhage" if imaging demonstrates a bleed. See Internet Stroke Center. "Oxford Stroke Scale". Retrieved 2008-11-14.
12. Bamford, J.M. (2000). "The Role of the Clinical Examination in the Subclassification of Stroke". Cerebrovascular Diseases. 10 (4): 2–4. doi: 10.1159/000047582. PMID 11070389.
13. Adams, H. P.; Bendixen, B. H.; Kappelle, L. J.; Biller, J.; Love, B. B.; Gordon, D. L.; Marsh, E. E. (1993). "Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment". Stroke. 24(1): 35–41. doi: 10.1161/ 01.STR.24.1.35. PMID 7678184.
14. Mathews, Marlon S.; Sharma, J.; Snyder, K. V.; Natarajan, S. K.; Siddiqui, A. H.; Hopkins, L. N.; Levy, E. I. (2009). "Safety, Effectiveness, and Practicality of Endovascular Therapy Within the First 3 Hours of Acute Ischemic Stroke Onset". Neurosurgery. 65 (5): 860–5, discussion 865. doi:10.1227/ 01.NEU.0000358953.19069.E5. PMID 19834397.
15. Winter, Jackie; Hunter, S.; Sim, J.; Crome, P. (2011). Winter, Jackie (ed.). "Hands-on therapy interventions for upper limb motor dysfunction following stroke". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (6): CD006609. doi: 10.1002/ 14651858.CD006609.pub2. PMC 6464865. PMID 21678359.
16. Hoffmann, Tammy; Bennett, S.; Koh, C. L.; McKenna, K. T. (2010). Hoffmann, Tammy (ed.). "Occupational therapy for cognitive impairment in stroke patients" (PDF). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (9): CD006430. doi: 10.1002/ 14651858.CD006430.pub2. PMC 6464961. PMID 20824849.
17. Legg, L.; Drummond, A.; Leonardi-Bee, J.; Gladman, J R F; Corr, S.; Donkervoort, M.; Edmans, J.; Gilbertson, L.; et al. (2007). "Occupational therapy for patients with problems in personal activities of daily living after stroke: Systematic review of randomised trials".
Received on 25.01.2020 Modified on 30.03.2020
Accepted on 27.05.2020 ©A&V Publications All right reserved
Asian J. Nursing Education and Research. 2020; 10(4):483-486.
DOI: 10.5958/2349-2996.2020.00103.2