Detection of Urine abnormalities among school children
Tini Nitto, Mary Alexander
Puhspagiri College of Nursing, Tiruvalla, Pathanamthitta, Kerala – 689101.
*Corresponding Author Email: tini91kuriakose@gmail.com, mj07835@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Introduction: Urinary abnormalities in children may go unnoticed and can result in severe kidney diseases. Thus, their early detection is an important strategy in the prevention and control of CKD. In this study, school children are screened for “urine abnormalities” like presence of protein, blood, glucose, ketones, nitrite, leukocytes, bilirubin, urobilinogen and abnormalities in pH and specific gravity using the urine dip strips. Objectives: The objectives of the study were to detect urine abnormalities among school children (10-14 years) and to find association between the detected abnormalities with selected baseline variables of children. Method: The study was done on 235 children using purposive sampling technique. Data on demographic variables, physical examination and urine dip-strip test results were collected from four schools over a period of one month. Data analysis was done using frequency and percentage, Chi-square and Fishers Exact test. Results: The study results revealed that 90.2% (212) of the students had urine abnormalities and the major urine abnormality detected was increased urine specific gravity in 89.36% (210), and all other abnormalities were in less than 3.4% (8) of the samples, namely Bilirubinuria in 3.4% (8), leukocyturia in 1.7% (4), alkaline pH in 1.27% (3) and proteinuria in 0.4% (1) and that there is a significant association between presence of urinary abnormalities with age (p= 0.001) and place of residence (p= 0.001) at 0.05 level of significance. Conclusion: Significant urine abnormalities though found in a small number of children, their early detection is crucial to prevent Chronic Kidney Disease.
KEYWORDS: Early detection, Urinary abnormalities, Urine dip-strip analysis, Chronic kidney disease.
INTRODUCTION:
Chronic kidney disease is an insidious and irreversible condition that eventually progresses to end stage renal failure and is now a worldwide crisis. According to the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study, disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for CKD has risen from 29th in 1990 to 18th in 2019.1 Chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains an alarming disease and constitutes a major public health challenge among children too, with a global prevalence of 15–74.7 cases/million children.2 Kidney disease often goes undetected in the general population, but children are at an even greater risk.
The main aim of the World Kidney Day 2016 with the theme “Kidney Disease and Children: Act early to prevent it” was to combat the increase of preventable kidney diseases in children which directed the investigator to do something on early detection of kidney disease in children.
In children, asymptomatic urinary findings like proteinuria as well as hematuria may be sometimes the only early signs of renal diseases like membranous nephropathy, membrano-proliferative glomerulonephritis.3 Detection of early proteinuria, hematuria, proteinuria with hematuria, hypertension, body mass index (BMI) abnormalities, and a composite data analysis in children may be more helpful in diagnosing renal disease earlier and initiating measures to slow progression to advanced stages of CKD. Hence, Urine examination is perhaps the most important, easiest and simplest test, which should be considered as the part of physical examination in all children being screened for Kidney diseases. The basic dip-stick method of urine analysis is the most rapid screening procedure that could be helpful in the early detection of renal or urinary tract diseases. The purpose of this study was to screen school children for the presence of urine abnormalities.
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY:
1. To detect urine abnormalities among school children of 10- 14 years
2. To find association between presence of urinary abnormalities with the selected baseline variables of children.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Operational definition:
Urine abnormalities: In this study, “urine abnormalities” refer to the presence of protein, blood, glucose, ketones, nitrite, leukocytes, bilirubin, urobilinogen and abnormalities in pH and specific gravity as assessed by using urine dip-strips (Aspen Diagnostics Private Limited). The change in colour on the urine dip-strip was interpreted as per the instructions given by the manufacturing company.
Research approach:
Quantitative approach
Research design:
descriptive survey design
Research variable:
Presence of urinary abnormalities among school children.
Population:
School children between 10 to 14 years of age.
Sample:
The study was done on 235 school children between 10 to 14 years of age. The sample size was calculated using the equation N= 4pq/ D2
Sampling technique:
Purposive sampling
Setting of the study:
Four selected schools (under Dy. DE, Pathanamthitta District)
Inclusion criteria:
School children between 10 – 14 years of age who were present at the time of data collection and were willing to participate in the study
Exclusion criteria:
· Female school children who were having their menstrual periods or were within seven days of their LMP during the time of data collection
· School children who were currently on any medications
· School children already diagnosed with kidney diseases
Tools and Technique:
Tool 1: This tool had two sections. Section A- Baseline proforma was used to collect baseline details like age, sex, place of residence and relevant history of child with respect to urinary abnormalities which was to be filled by their parents using Self-report by parents of the child. Section B- Physical examination proforma consisted a chart for recording anthropometric measurements, vital signs and the head to foot examination in order to screen children for the risk factors related to urine abnormalities using Observation and Bio-physical measures.
Tool 2: consisted of a record of the results of urine dip strip test of the study samples following the guidelines given by the manufacturing company (Aspen Diagnostics Private Limited). The urine dip strips were read and interpreted as follows:
· Each sample was assessed within one hour of collection of samples.
· Each parameter was read following 60 seconds of dipping the dip-strip in urine and was interpreted within the prescribed time for each parameter as mentioned by the manufacturer.
· Repeat testing was done for those who with a positive test.
Content Validity of the tool:
The prepared tools along with objectives, criteria checklist were submitted to nine experts that included two nephrologists, one pediatrician, one expert from community medicine and five child health nursing experts. Their valuable suggestions were included for the modification of the tool.
Reliability:
Reliability of the dip-strip analysis was found using inter-observer method, where the researcher and her colleague separately analyzed the urine samples taken from 10 school students’ using separate dip-strips of the same brand, and reliability coefficient ‘r’ was calculated using the formula: r = (no. of agreements)/ (no. of agreements + no. of disagreements); The reliability of the tool was 0.8 which indicated that the tool was reliable.
The weighing machine, BP apparatus and mercury thermometer were calibrated by Biomedical Engineering Department of a Tertiary Care Centre at Tiruvalla.
Pilot study: was conducted on 10% of the sample size in Feb. 2017 in a selected High School of Pathanamthitta
Data collection:
The data collection for the main study was done over a 4wks period in Feb-March 2017. After getting the ethical clearance from the Institutional Ethics Committee, the schools were identified as per the planned sampling technique. Permission from the school authorities was obtained and a convenient time for data collection was identified. Based on the time allotted for data collection, the investigator went to the selected schools. The purpose of the study was explained to the students with the help of a power point presentation. Consent forms (including information about the study, parental consent and student assent) and tool 1 were distributed and they were asked to get it filled by the parents and return it on the next allotted day. On the next day, the height and weight measurements (taken by a colleague of the investigator) and blood pressure measurement and physical examination (done by the investigator herself) were done for those children who got their parental consent and also gave their assent. Following this their BMI was calculated and BP levels were classified and the investigator performed urine analysis. Repeat urine examinations were performed on those children with abnormal urine findings. Around 25children were assessed in a day and the data was coded and entered onto the master sheet. The analysis was done using descriptive (frequency and percentages) and inferential statistics (Chi- square test and Fisher’s exact test) with the help of SPSS 20th version.
RESULT:
Section A: Distribution of samples based on their baseline variables
Table 1a: Frequency and percentage distribution of samples according to their age, sex, place of residence, type of birth, presence of kidney disease since birth or relevant health history of child with respect to urinary abnormalities and presence of any symptoms of kidney disease in the past six months. (N= 235)
Sl. No. |
Variables |
f |
% |
1. |
Age |
|
|
|
10-<12 years |
73 |
31.1 |
|
12-14 years |
162 |
68.9 |
2. |
Sex |
|
|
|
Male |
108 |
46.0 |
|
Female |
127 |
54.0 |
3. |
Place of residence |
|
|
|
Urban |
37 |
15.7 |
|
Rural |
198 |
84.3 |
4. |
Type of birth |
|
|
|
Term birth |
212 |
90.2 |
|
Preterm birth |
023 |
09.8 |
5. |
Presence of any detected kidney disease (since birth) |
0 |
0 |
6. |
History of- |
|
|
|
any chronic illness |
4 |
1.7 |
|
frequent infections since birth |
12 |
5.1 |
|
medication intake |
12 |
5.1 |
|
family history of renal disease |
6 |
2.6 |
7. |
CKD Symptoms (within past 6 months)- |
|
|
|
Urinary symptoms |
|
|
|
· Increased frequency of micturition |
5 |
2.1 |
|
· Difficulty in passing urine |
2 |
0.9 |
|
· Burning sensation |
10 |
4.3 |
|
· Blood in urine |
0 |
0 |
|
· Frothy urine |
06 |
2.6 |
|
Unexplained fever |
17 |
7.2 |
|
Dry skin |
15 |
6.4 |
|
Weight loss |
11 |
4.7 |
|
Nausea/Vomiting |
4 |
1.7 |
|
Diarrhoea |
04 |
1.7 |
|
Fatigue |
15 |
6.4 |
The above table 1(a) shows that out of the 235 samples, 68.9% (162) were in the age group of 12-14 years, 54% (127) were females, 84.3% (198) reported to belong to rural area, most of the samples i.e. 90.2% (212) were born at term and none of them were found to have any kidney related disease since birth and 5.1% (12) had frequent infections since birth and also had a history of medication intake in the previous years. Among the symptoms of kidney disease within the past six months, the most common urinary symptom reported is burning sensation, in 4.3% (10). Among the other symptoms majority i.e. 7.2% (17) had unexplained fever.
Table 1b: Frequency and percentage distribution of samples based on physical examination findings. (N= 235)
Sl. No. |
Physical Examination Findings |
F |
% |
1. |
Body Mass Index |
|
|
|
Underweight |
033 |
14.0 |
|
Normal |
173 |
73.6 |
|
Overweight |
019 |
08.1 |
|
Obese |
010 |
04.3 |
2. |
Blood pressure |
|
|
|
Normal |
122 |
51.9 |
|
Prehypertension |
107 |
45.5 |
|
Stage 1 hypertension |
005 |
2.10 |
|
Stage 2 hypertension |
001 |
0.40 |
3. |
Body built |
|
|
|
Lean |
080 |
34.0 |
|
Moderate |
145 |
61.7 |
|
Heavy |
010 |
04.3 |
4. |
Activity |
|
|
|
Active |
235 |
100.0 |
|
Dull |
000 |
00,0 |
5. |
Skin |
|
|
|
Normal |
219 |
93.2 |
|
Dry skin |
015 |
06.4 |
|
Rashes |
001 |
00.4 |
6. |
Flank pain |
|
|
|
Yes |
002 |
00.9 |
|
No |
233 |
99.1 |
The above table 1(b) shows that out of the 235 samples, 34% appeared lean, but only 14% were underweight, 8.1% were overweight and a few i.e. 4.3% were obese. Also 45.5% were found to have pre-hypertension, 2.1% had stage 1 hypertension and 0.4% had stage 2 hypertension. All of them were found to be active and the head to foot examination showed that 6.4% had dry skin, 0.4% had rashes and 0.9% had flank pain.
Section B: Urinary Abnormalities among School Children (N= 235)
Fig 1: Pie diagram on total number of students detected to have a urine abnormality
The figure 1 shows that urine abnormality was present in majority i.e. 90.2% (212) of the samples and a few i.e. 9.8% (23) of the samples did not have any urine abnormalities.
Table 2: Distribution of samples based on urine abnormalities detected among school children (N= 235)
S. No. |
Urine characteristics |
F |
% |
1. |
Colour of urine |
|
|
|
Normal (straw coloured) |
164 |
69.80 |
|
Abnormal (dark yellow, brownish, red) |
071 |
30.20 |
2. |
Clarity |
|
|
|
Clear |
235 |
100.0 |
|
Turbid |
0 |
0 |
3. |
Urine abnormalities detected |
|
|
|
Hypersthenuria |
210 |
89.36 |
|
Bilirubinuria |
008 |
03.40 |
|
Leukocyturia |
004 |
01.70 |
|
Alkaline pH |
003 |
01.27 |
|
Proteinuria |
001 |
00.42 |
The above table 2 shows that all had clear urine but more than a quarter i.e. 30.2% had dark yellow urine, and 90.2% had urine abnormalities. The most common urine abnormality detected was hypersthenuria/ increased specific gravity i.e. 89.36%, followed by bilirubinuria in 3.4%, leukocyturia in 1.7% and 1.27% had alkaline ph. The least detected urine abnormality was proteinuria (0.42%). None of them had urobilinogenuria, ketonuria, nitrituria, glycosuria and hematuria respectively.
Section C: Association between presence of urinary abnormalities and selected baseline variables of children
Table 3 Association between the number of school children detected to have urinary abnormalities with their selected baseline variables such as age, sex, family history, type of birth, place of residence, medication history, blood pressure and BMI (N= 235)
Variables |
Urine abnormality |
ᵡ2 value |
p value |
||
Present |
Absent |
||||
f |
f |
||||
Age |
|
|
|
|
|
10-<12 years |
061 |
12 |
12.801 |
0.001** |
|
12-14 years |
151 |
11 |
|
|
|
Sex |
|
|
|
|
|
Male |
099 |
09 |
0.478 |
0.489 |
|
Female |
113 |
14 |
|
|
|
Family history |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
005 |
01 |
0.330* |
0.465 |
|
No |
207 |
22 |
|
|
|
Type of birth |
|
|
|
|
|
Term |
189 |
23 |
2.766* |
0.140 |
|
Preterm |
023 |
00 |
|
|
|
Place of residence |
|
|
|
|
|
Urban |
028 |
09 |
10.511 |
0.001** |
|
Rural |
184 |
14 |
|
|
|
Medication history |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
012 |
00 |
1.372* |
0.613 |
|
No |
200 |
23 |
|
|
|
Blood pressure |
|
|
|
|
|
Normal |
108 |
14 |
1.274 |
0.735 |
|
Pre-hypertension |
098 |
09 |
|
|
|
Stage 1and 2 hypertension |
006 |
00 |
|
|
|
BMI |
|
|
|
|
|
Underweight |
030 |
03 |
2.360 |
0.501 |
|
Normal |
154 |
19 |
|
|
|
Overweight or obese |
028 |
01 |
|
|
|
(*Fisher’s exact test, ** Significant at ≤ 0.05 level of significance)
Table 3 reveals that an association exists between presence of urinary abnormalities with age and place of residence at ≤ 0.05 level of significance. No association was found with family history, type of birth and Medication history which was analyzed using Fisher’s exact test.
DISCUSSION:
Section 1: Discussion related to distribution of samples based on baseline variables:
In the present study, of the 235 samples, the highest prevalence of urine abnormalities was seen in children aged 12 to 14years (68.9%). This finding agrees with P. N. Vinoth et al who conducted a similar study on screening for asymptomatic renal disease among school children in Chennai.(3) The current study had nearly half (54%) of the samples as females which is same as in the studies conducted by F. Akor et al(4), A. N. Okpere et al5, and Ramadan A. Mahmoud et al.6
When analyzing the frequency and percentage distribution of the samples based on relevant health history of the child with respect to urine abnormalities, only 1.7% (4) of the samples had reported a history of chronic illness requiring hospitalization in the past which included appendicitis (0.4%), asthma (0.4%), headache (0.4%) and oophorectomy procedure (0.4%). Six (2.6%) of the study samples reported to have a family history of renal disease which was reported to be either in grandfather, father, aunt or nephew. Only 12(5.1%) of them reported to have frequent infections since birth, which included dust allergy (0.4%), eczema(0.9%), headache(0.4%), itching and pus formation(0.4%), occasional breathing difficulty (0.4%), occasional fever(0.4%), skin lesions(0.4%), sneezing(0.4%), skin lesions on leg(0.4%), throat pain during fever(0.4%) and tonsillitis(0.4%). Among the children with fever and frequent throat infections in the past, only 0.8% of the children reported to have a urine abnormality i.e. increased specific gravity. Concerning the medication history, only 12 (i.e. 5.1%) of the students were on medications which was for allergic sneeze, asthma, dry skin, hair loss, seizure, skin disease, thyroid, nasal block and as iron supplements. All children who were on medications were found to have a urine abnormality i.e. increased specific gravity. The frequency and percentage distribution of the samples based on their reporting of symptoms related to urinary abnormalities over the past six months revealed that 23(9.78%) children reported of urinary symptoms. Among those with urinary symptoms, the most common symptom reported was burning sensation (indicative of UTI) which was of 4.3% (10) in the samples. The next common urinary symptom reported was frothy urine (which could be related proteinuria), reported by 2.6% (6), followed by increased frequency of micturition i.e. 2.1% (5). Only 0.9% (2) of the samples mentioned a history of difficulty in passing urine and none of them reported to have hematuria. The investigator couldn’t find any study supporting or contradicting these details.
Gender-wise comparison shows that urinary symptoms were commonly verbalized by males while the other symptoms show somewhat equal representation in both genders. This fact is contradicted by a study conducted by C .S. V. Kumar et al.7
Renal disease, particularly in children, may present in a subtle manner such as failure to thrive, unexplained fevers, vague pains, gastrointestinal symptoms, anemia, abdominal mass, edema, and hypertension.8 In this study, the investigator looked for the above presented symptoms and found that 66(28.08%) children had reported of having had other symptoms (other than urinary symptoms) related to urinary abnormalities within past six months. Among them, a few i.e. 7.2% (17) mentioned that they had unexplained fever, 6.4% (15) each of the subjects verbalized of having fatigue and dry skin in the past six months, 4.7% (11) had weight loss and nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea were reported by 1.7% (4) each of the samples.
The frequency and percentage distribution of the samples based on their physical examination findings shows that a major portion of them i.e. 73.6% (173) had normal BMI, while some i.e. 8.1% (19) were overweight, 14% (33) were underweight and a few i.e. 4.3% (10) were obese. Further, of the 235 samples, more than half i.e. 61.7% (145) of school children were of moderate built, some i.e. 34% (80) of the children were lean and a few i.e. 4.3% (10) of them were overweight. More than half of the school children i.e. 51.9% (122) had normal BP, while almost equivalent number i.e. 45.5% (107) had pre-hypertension, a few i.e. 2.1% (5) had stage 1 hypertension and one of them i.e. 0.4% had stage 2 hypertension. All of the 235(100%) school children were active. Pallor, cyanosis, clubbing and generalized body edema were not found in any of them. 6.4% (15) of the 235 school children had dry skin, only two of them (i.e. 0.9%) had flank pain and one (i.e. 0.4%) of the students had icterus and skin rashes. Other aspects of assessment related to head/ face, eyes mouth and extremities revealed normal findings in all of the 235 school children. The investigator couldn’t find any study supporting these details.
Section 2: Discussion related to urinary abnormalities among school children:
On analyzing the distribution of the samples based on the presence of urine abnormalities, it was found that more than half i.e. 69.8% (164) of school children had normal straw coloured urine but 30.2% (71) had dark yellow coloured urine which indicated possible dehydration. On enquiring further out of curiosity, the investigator got the report of a low fluid intake. None of them had brownish or red coloured urine which may be found in liver, kidney or hematologic disorders, or related to certain medications, food or trauma. All of the 235 school children had clear urine with no turbidity.
A majority of the school children i.e. 90.2% (212) of the sample of school children were detected to have some or the other of the ten urine abnormalities when assessed by the urine dip strip test.
It is a well-known fact that the most common urinary abnormalities found among children are hematuria and proteinuria.9 Hematuria, which is known to be a significant finding indicating kidney disease and is caused following urinary tract infection, bladder or kidney stone, kidney injury, kidney infections like glomerulonephritis, inherited diseases like sickle cell anemia, trauma and menstrual bleeding, was not seen in any of the samples. Opposing this finding many other studies conducted in Karnataka,10 Egypt,11 Nigeria4 and Sudan12 showed a prevalence of hematuria as 5%, 9.8%, 1.5% and 9.5% respectively. Proteinuria, which is known to be caused by hyper-infiltration or kidney injury or due to kidney disease with reduced nephron mass13 is commonly seen in nephrotic syndrome, renal dysplasia, diabetes or hypertension. Only one sample (i.e. 0.42%) in the present study had proteinuria. Supporting this finding, studies conducted in Karnataka,10 Kashmir,14 Egypt,11 Chennai,3 Nigeria4 and Sudan12 also show a prevalence of proteinuria as 16%, 2.17%, 2.6%, 2.5%, 1.5% and 7.1% respectively. The reduced prevalence in this study could be probably due to the small sample size or due to the differences in the geographic area in which the study took place.
In the present study, even though only one (i.e. 0.4%) of the student were found to be icteric, urobilinogen was not detected in any of the urine samples whereas bilirubinuria was seen in 3.4% (8) of the samples. Contradictory to this, a study conducted in Nigeria(4) reports the prevalence of urobilinogen as 1.8% and 1.7% (11) had bilirubinuria. Urobilinogenuria and bilirubinuria are urine abnormalities which do not reflect any kidney related diseases and these are usually found in conditions like biliary tract disease, hepatitis, gall stones, liver disease and tumours of liver or gall bladder.15 Since the presence of bilirubin in urine is an early indicator of liver disease even before clinical symptoms appear, the students may require repeat testing and further evaluation. This was suggested to the school authorities.
Glycosuria and Ketonuria are typically found in association with diabetes and kidney disease. In the present study, neither glycosuria nor ketonuria was detected in any of the samples. Contradictory to this finding, a similar study conducted by Francis Akor et al4 reported presence of ketones as 0.6% and a study conducted by P. N. Vinoth et al3 showed the prevalence of glycosuria as 0.3%.
Nitrites in urine usually indicate UTI, cystitis etc. and leukocyturia, also may be due to kidney infections, children holding urine for too long or due to any blockage in the urinary tract.(16) In the present study, nitrites were not detected in urine of any of the 235 school students but 1.7% (4) of the students had leukocyturia. Related studies which showed a presence of nitrituria, were carried out among pre-schoolers and primary school children where the prevalence was 0.45%17 and 2%.18 Similarly, the prevalence of leukocyturia was 1%.18
In this study, majority of the samples i.e. 89.36% (210) had increased urine specific gravity (hypersthenuria). Hyperesthenuria is known to be found in case of dehydration, emesis, diarrhoea, excessive sweating or urinary tract infection.19 The investigator couldn’t find any supporting or contradicting studies related to this data. The pH findings in the present study detected that 1.27% (3) had alkaline urine. As per literature, alkaline urine is present in cases like renal tubular acidosis, urinary tract infections and vomiting as per literature review.19 The investigator couldn’t find any supporting study related to this finding.
Section 3: Discussion related to association between presence of urinary abnormalities with selected baseline variables of children
In the present study, Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test (used in case >20% of the cells had a value less than five) were done to assess the association between presence of urinary abnormalities and selected baseline variables of the children such as age, sex, place of residence, type of birth, family history, medication history, blood pressure and BMI. A highly significant association was between the presence of urinary abnormality and the age of children (p=0.001) which can be supported by a study conducted by Rotimi Williams et al20 where the p-value was <0.0001. A significant association was also found between the presence of urine abnormality and the place of residence (p= 0.001) of the samples at a significance level of ≤0.05. At the same time, no association was found between the presence of urinary abnormalities and other selected baseline variables like sex, type of birth, family history, medication history and BMI. Whereas a study conducted by Rotimi Williams et al20 showed an association of leukocyturia and proteinuria with hypertension having a p value < 0.0001.
CONCLUSION:
Detection of certain urine abnormalities could sometimes be the only early finding of a kidney disease, which if identified on time would help in preventing the dreaded disease. The current study findings revealed that majority of the school children (90.2%) had urinary abnormalities and that there is highly significant association between presence of urinary abnormality and age of children (p= 0.001); and between urinary abnormality and place of residence (p= 0.001) at ≤0.05 level of significance. As many of the school children had urinary abnormalities, the results were informed to the Principal/concerned Headmaster or Headmistress of the school and it was made clear to them to communicate about the abnormal findings directly to the children’s parents without fail so that further evaluation could be done to identify the presence of life-threatening disease. It was clearly explained to them that the present study uses just a screening method which can have false positive results but the findings must be followed up to ensure that the child has a healthy future.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
The authors have no conflicts of interest regarding this investigation.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
The authors would like to thank the selected school managements for their kind support during the study.
REFERENCES:
1. Ke C, Liang J, Liu M, Liu S, Wang C. Burden of chronic kidney disease and its risk-attributable burden in 137 low-and middle-income countries, 1990–2019: results from the global burden of disease study 2019. BMC Nephrol. 2022; 23(1): 17.
2. Amanullah F, Malik AA, Zaidi Z. Chronic kidney disease causes and outcomes in children: Perspective from a LMIC setting. PLoS One. 2022; 17(6): e0269632.
3. Vinoth PN, Kumar B V, Chacko B. Screening for Asymptomatic Renal Disease among School Children from Chennai City, India. Int J Sci Study. 2015; 3(7): 207–11.
4. Akor F., Okolo S. N., Agaba E. I., Okolo A. Urine examination findings in apparently healthy new school entrants in Jos, Nigeria. South African J Child Heal. 2009; 3(2).
5. Okpere A, Anochie I, Eke F. Prevalence of Microalbuminuria among secondary school children. Afr Health Sci. 2012; 12(2).
6. Mahmoud R, Masry A, Mohammad R, Yousef F. Urinary Screening for Detection of Renal Abnormalities in Asymptomatic School Children, Sohag Governorate, Egypt. Br J Med Med Res. 2016;13(6):1–8.
7. Kumar CS V, Jairam A, Chetan S, Sudesh P, Kapur I, Srikaramallya. Asymptomatic bacteriuria in school going children. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2002; 20(1): 29–32.
8. Barakat AJ. Presentation of the Child with Renal Disease and Guidelines for Referral to the Pediatric Nephrologist. Int J Pediatr. 2012; 2012: 1–5.
9. Viteri B, Reid-Adam J. Hematuria and Proteinuria in Children. Pediatr Rev. 2018; 39(12): 573–87.
10. Karlsson K, Rydström I, Enskär K, Englund ACD. Nurses’ perspectives on supporting children during needle-related medical procedures. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2014; 9(1).
11. Fouad M, Boraie M. Prevalence of asymptomatic urinary abnormalities among adolescents. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transplant. 2016; 27(3): 500.
12. Bazie EA, Mohamed M, Ali A, Hamza HB, Ismail AM, Siddig M, et al. Screening Of Proteinuria and Hematuria in Asymptomatic Children in Basic School-Kosti City-In White Nile (Kosti City). J Med Biol Sci Res. 2015; 1(9): 118–23.
13. Kallen RJ. Pediatric Proteinuria. Pediatrics: General Medicine. 2021.
14. Malla H, Bhat A, Shazia B, Rather F, Najar S, Wani I. Prevalence of proteinuria in school children (aged 12-14 years) in Kashmir valley, India, using dipstick method. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transplant. 2016; 27(5):1006.
15. Hoilat GJ, John S. Bilirubinuria. Stat Pearls. 2023
16. Papava V, Didbaridze T, Zaalishvili Z, Gogokhia N, Maziashvili G. The Role of Urinary Nitrite in Predicting Bacterial Resistance in Urine Culture Analysis Among Patients With Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection. Cureus. 2022.
17. Hajar F, Taleb M, Aoun B, Shatila A. Dipstick urine analysis screening among asymptomatic school children. N Am J Med Sci. 2011; 179–84.
18. Nhu Nguyet Dang L, Le Binh Doan T, Doan NH, Kim Hoa Pham T, Smets F, Tran Thi MH, et al. Epidemiological urinalysis of children from kindergartens of Can Gio, Ho Chi Minh City - Vietnam. BMC Pediatr. 2013; 13(1): 183.
19. A. D, Milani Q, Jialal I. Urinalysis. Stat Pearls. Stat Pearls Publishing; 2023.
20. Fan Y, Zhang S, Li Y, Li Y, Zhang T, Liu W, et al. Development and psychometric testing of the Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices (KAP) questionnaire among student Tuberculosis (TB) Patients (STBP-KAPQ) in China. BMC Infect Dis. 2018; 18(1): 1–10.
Received on 01.09.2023 Modified on 08.11.2023
Accepted on 18.01.2024 ©AandV Publications All right reserved
Asian J. Nursing Education and Research. 2024; 14(1):5-11.
DOI: 10.52711/2349-2996.2024.00002