A Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Interventional Package on Birth Preparedness and Complication Readiness among women
Simi A, Laishram Dabashini Devi
Global College of Nursing, Bangalore.
*Corresponding Author Email:
ABSTRACT:
This study was conducted with the aim to assess the effectiveness of interventional package on birth preparedness and complication readiness among pregnant women in selected PHC.The objectives were to assess the level of knowledge regarding birth preparedness and complication readiness, develop and administer interventional package regarding birth preparedness and complication readiness, effectiveness of interventional package on birth preparedness and complication readiness and to find the association with the knowledge scores and selected demographic variables. The research design for this study is one group pre-test and post-test research design. The study was conducted in selected PHC, Bengaluru. All the antenatal mothers in selected PHC, Bengaluru. Antenatal mothers who fulfill inclusion criteria are considered as sample. The sample size is 60 antenatal mothers. Sampling technique adopted was Purposive/convenience sampling technique. Pregnant women who are available at the time of data collection in selected PHC.The findings indicates that The above table regarding post test knowledge shows that the knowledge level had improved from moderate to adequate level i.e (83.3%). The above table regarding post test knowledge shows that the knowledge level had improved from moderate to adequate level i.e (83.3%). The above tables revealed that there is a significant association in the category of religion, family type, area of residence and family income/month with selected demographic variables. The above tables revealed that there is a significant association in the category of gestation age of pregnancy and number of antenatal visits during pregnancy whereas in the category of first ANC registration, previous knowledge and source of information were found to be not significant with selected demographic variables. Hence the study concluded that birth preparedness and is needed to be provided as an awareness program so that the complication regarding any pregnancy problems can be readiness prepared and avoid the complication among the pregnant mothers.
KEYWORDS: Birth Preparedness, Complication Readiness.
INTRODUCTION:
Pregnancy is a unique, exciting and often blissful period in a woman’s life. During pregnancy a woman undergoes various physiological changes which may lead to complications at any stage of pregnancy. Unexpected, and often life-threatening, events might occur at any stage of pregnancy, during the antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum periods.1 The timely use of skilled maternal and neonatal care, during pregnancy and childbirth will reduce maternal mortality and morbidity.2 Labor is one of the greatest events in every woman’s life. It is the fulfillment of their dreams during labor, the mother needs lot of help for the realization and acceptance of labor as a normal physiological phenomenon. She needs to develop a healthy attitude towards pregnancy. So that, she might have a safe and emotionally satisfying experience of labor and a rapid recovery can occur mentally and physically in the puerperium. Realization of this need by the obstetricians led to the development of psychometric method of preparation for labour2.India faces several challenges in meeting the needs of pregnant women, particularly for complications of pregnancy and obstetric emergencies. Pregnancy related services are underused as pregnancy is regarded as being a ‘natural’ phenomenon.
Practices undermining the important of increased diet during pregnancy and breast-feeding practices are rampant. Anemia is the second largest cause of maternal deaths (19 percent) and more than 50 percent of women are anemic with 17 percent moderately or severely. This could be prevented if timely care and information and intervention reaches to the population in need. Statistics available during 2006, suggests that over 60% of all deliveries are still conducted at home, without a skilled birth attendant. 7 63.6% report pregnancy related complication, during childbirth it is 37% and 44.4% during the postnatal period.3
The research design for this study is one group pre-test and post-test research design. The study was conducted in selected PHC, Bengaluru. All the antenatal mothers in selected PHC, Bengaluru. Antenatal mothers who fulfill inclusion criteria are considered as sample. The sample size is 60 antenatal mothers. Sampling technique adopted was Purposive/convenience sampling technique. Pregnant women who are available at the time of data collection in selected PHC. The data for this study will be collected by a structured questionnaire schedule on birth preparedness and its complication among antenatal mothers whose contents was validated by experts and will be pre-tested and standardized through pilot study. Structured knowledge questionnaire schedule, it has two parts. In this it refers to age, religion, education, occupation, type of family, monthly income and source of information regarding birth preparedness, No. of pregnancy and questions regarding birth preparedness and its complication readiness of antenatal mothers.
RESULTS:
The table-1 indicates that most of the respondents were between the age group of 27-31 yrs, 20 was illiterate and most of them were housewife.
Table–1: Classification of Respondents by Personal Characteristics
N=60
|
Characteristics |
Category |
Respondents |
|
|
Number |
Percent |
||
|
Age group |
18-21 |
7 |
11.7 |
|
22-26 |
13 |
21.6 |
|
|
27-31 |
33 |
55.0 |
|
|
32-34 |
7 |
11.7 |
|
|
Educational level
|
Illiterate |
20 |
33.3 |
|
Primary |
7 |
11.7 |
|
|
High school |
7 |
11.7 |
|
|
Intermediate |
16 |
26.6 |
|
|
Graduate |
10 |
16.7 |
|
|
Occupational status |
House wife |
47 |
78.3 |
|
Coolie worker |
13 |
21.7 |
|
|
Total |
|
60 |
100.0 |
Table – 2: Classification of Respondents by Family Characteristics N=60
|
Characteristics |
Category |
Respondents |
|
|
Number |
Percent |
||
|
Religion |
Hindu |
60 |
100.0 |
|
Christian |
0 |
0.0 |
|
|
Family type |
Nuclear |
37 |
61.7 |
|
Joint |
23 |
38.3 |
|
|
Area of Residence |
Rural |
53 |
88.3 |
|
Urban |
7 |
11.7 |
|
|
Family Income/month |
Rs.10,000-20,000 |
33 |
55.0 |
|
Rs.20,001-30,000 |
27 |
45.0 |
|
|
Total |
|
60 |
100.0 |
The above table-2 shows that most of them were hindu (100%), they belong to nuclear family (61.7%), and belong to rural areas and incomes were between 20,001-30000.
Table – 3: Classification of Respondents by Clinical Profile N=60
|
Characteristics |
Category |
Respondents |
|
|
Number |
Percent |
||
|
Gestational age of pregnancy (months) |
0-3 |
13 |
21.7 |
|
4-6 |
21 |
35.0 |
|
|
7-9 |
26 |
43.3 |
|
|
First ANC Registration |
First Trimester |
47 |
78.3 |
|
Second Trimester |
6 |
10.0 |
|
|
Third Trimester |
7 |
11.7 |
|
|
No. of Antenatal visits during Pregnancy |
One |
13 |
21.7 |
|
Two |
21 |
35.0 |
|
|
Three and above |
26 |
43.3 |
|
|
Previous knowledge |
Yes |
40 |
66.7 |
|
No |
20 |
33.3 |
|
|
Source of Information |
Health workers |
40 |
66.7 |
|
No |
20 |
33.3 |
|
|
Total |
|
60 |
100.0 |
The above table-3 revealed that most of the respondents were in 7-9 months gestation, registered only for first trimester, and had come for almost 3 times visit and (66.7%) had some knowledge got from health workers (66.7%)
Table – 4: Classification of Respondent Pre test Knowledge level on Birth preparedness and Complication readiness
|
Knowledge Level |
Category |
Respondents |
|
|
Number |
Percent |
||
|
Inadequate |
≤ 50 % Score |
27 |
45.0 |
|
Moderate |
51-75 % Score |
33 |
55.0 |
|
Adequate |
> 75 % Score |
0 |
0.0 |
|
Total |
|
60 |
100.0 |
Table -5: Aspect wise Pre test Mean Knowledge scores on Birth preparedness and Complication readiness N=60
|
S. No. |
Knowledge Aspects |
Statements |
Max. Score |
Knowledge Scores |
|||
|
Mean |
SD |
Mean (%) |
SD (%) |
||||
|
I |
General concept |
3 |
3 |
1.58 |
1.01 |
52.8 |
33.8 |
|
II |
Antenatal care and advices |
6 |
6 |
3.12 |
1.29 |
51.9 |
21.5 |
|
III |
National protocol |
5 |
5 |
2.33 |
0.73 |
46.7 |
14.6 |
|
IV |
Target behaviors |
6 |
6 |
3.27 |
0.94 |
54.4 |
15.6 |
|
V |
Benefits |
6 |
6 |
3.47 |
1.28 |
57.8 |
21.4 |
|
VI |
Component of birth preparedness |
9 |
9 |
4.37 |
1.89 |
48.5 |
21.0 |
|
VII |
Danger signs and symptoms |
5 |
5 |
2.63 |
0.82 |
52.7 |
16.5 |
|
|
Combined |
40 |
40 |
20.77 |
3.55 |
51.9 |
8.9 |
The above table-4 revealed that most of the respondents had moderate level of knowledge i.e 55%.
The above table-5 revealed that in the area wise knowledge aspects falls more information the respondents had on general concepts (33.8%).
The above table-6 regarding post test knowledge shows that the knowledge level had improved from moderate to
adequate level i.e (83.3%).
The above table-7 revealed that in the area wise knowledge aspects in post test falls more information the respondents had on general concepts (88.3%) and danger signs and symptoms (76.7%).
Table -6: Classification of Respondents of Post test Knowledge level on Birth preparedness and Complication Readiness
|
Knowledge Level |
Category |
Respondents |
|
|
Number |
Percent |
||
|
Inadequate |
≤ 50 % Score |
0 |
0.0 |
|
Moderate |
51-75 % Score |
10 |
16.7 |
|
Adequate |
> 75 % Score |
50 |
83.3 |
|
Total |
|
60 |
100.0 |
Table -7: Aspect wise Post test Mean Knowledge scores on Birth preparedness and Complication readiness N=60
|
S. No. |
Knowledge Aspects |
Statements |
Max. Score |
Knowledge Scores |
|||
|
Mean |
SD |
Mean (%) |
SD (%) |
||||
|
I |
General concept |
3 |
3 |
2.65 |
0.52 |
88.3 |
17.2 |
|
II |
Antenatal care and advices |
6 |
6 |
5.47 |
0.83 |
91.1 |
13.9 |
|
III |
National protocol |
5 |
5 |
4.77 |
0.43 |
95.3 |
8.5 |
|
IV |
Target behaviors |
6 |
6 |
5.18 |
0.81 |
86.4 |
13.5 |
|
V |
Benefits |
6 |
6 |
5.40 |
0.92 |
90.0 |
15.4 |
|
VI |
Component of birth preparedness |
9 |
9 |
7.53 |
1.16 |
83.7 |
12.9 |
|
VII |
Danger signs and symptoms |
5 |
5 |
3.83 |
0.89 |
76.7 |
17.7 |
|
|
Combined |
40 |
40 |
34.83 |
2.96 |
87.1 |
7.4 |
Table – 8: Association between Demographic variables and Pre test Knowledge level on Birth preparedness and Complication readiness n=60
|
Demographic Variables |
Category |
Sample |
Knowledge Level |
χ 2 Value |
P Value |
|||
|
Inadequate |
Moderate |
|||||||
|
N |
% |
N |
% |
|||||
|
Age group |
18-21 |
7 |
4 |
57.1 |
3 |
42.9 |
11.92* |
P<0.05 (7.815) |
|
22-26 |
13 |
10 |
76.9 |
3 |
23.1 |
|||
|
27-31 |
33 |
13 |
39.4 |
20 |
60.6 |
|||
|
32-34 |
7 |
0 |
0.0 |
7 |
100.0 |
|||
|
Educational level
|
Illiterate |
20 |
11 |
55.0 |
9 |
45.0 |
16.36*
|
P<0.05 (9.488)
|
|
Primary |
7 |
7 |
100.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
|||
|
High school |
7 |
0 |
0.0 |
7 |
100.0 |
|||
|
Intermediate |
16 |
6 |
37.5 |
10 |
62.5 |
|||
|
Graduate |
10 |
3 |
30.0 |
7 |
70.0 |
|||
|
Occupational status |
House wife |
47 |
16 |
34.0 |
31 |
66.0 |
10.52* |
P<0.05 (3.841) |
|
Coolie worker |
13 |
11 |
84.6 |
2 |
15.4 |
|||
|
Combined |
|
60 |
27 |
45.0 |
33 |
55.0 |
|
|
* Significant at 5% Level; NS: Non-significant
Table – 9: Association between Demographic variables and Pre test Knowledge level on Birth preparedness and Complication readiness n=60
|
Demographic Variables |
Category |
Sample |
Knowledge Level |
χ 2 Value |
P Value |
|||
|
Inadequate |
Moderate |
|||||||
|
N |
% |
N |
% |
|||||
|
Religion |
Hindu |
60 |
27 |
45.0 |
33 |
55.0 |
0.00 NS |
P>0.05 (3.841) |
|
Christian |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
|||
|
Family type
|
Nuclear |
37 |
11 |
29.7 |
26 |
70.3 |
9.09* |
P<0.05 (3.841) |
|
Joint |
23 |
16 |
69.6 |
7 |
30.4 |
|||
|
Area of Residence |
Rural |
53 |
27 |
50.9 |
26 |
49.1 |
6.48* |
P<0.05 (3.841) |
|
Urban |
7 |
0 |
0.0 |
7 |
100.0 |
|||
|
Family Income/month |
Rs.10,000-20,000 |
33 |
24 |
72.7 |
9 |
27.3 |
22.78* |
P<0.05 (3.841) |
|
Rs.20,001-30,000 |
27 |
3 |
11.1 |
24 |
88.9 |
|||
|
Combined |
|
60 |
27 |
45.0 |
33 |
55.0 |
|
|
* Significant at 5% Level; NS : Non-significant
The above table-8 revealed that there is a significant association in the category of age group, educational level and occupational status with selected demographic variables.
The above table-9 revealed that there is a significant association in the category of religion, family type, area of residence and family income/month with selected demographic variables.
Table – 10: Association between Demographic variables and Pre test Knowledge level on Birth preparedness and Complication readiness n=60
|
Demographic Variables |
Category |
Sample |
Knowledge Level |
χ 2 Value |
P Value |
|||
|
Inadequate |
Moderate |
|||||||
|
N |
% |
N |
% |
|||||
|
Gestational age of pregnancy (months) |
0-3 |
13 |
6 |
46.2 |
7 |
53.8 |
7.42* |
P<0.05 (5.991) |
|
4-6 |
21 |
14 |
66.7 |
7 |
33.3 |
|||
|
7-9 |
26 |
7 |
26.9 |
19 |
73.1 |
|||
|
First ANC Registration |
First Trimester |
47 |
23 |
48.9 |
24 |
51.1 |
3.02 NS |
P>0.05 (5.991) |
|
Second Trimester |
6 |
3 |
50.0 |
3 |
50.0 |
|||
|
Third Trimester |
7 |
1 |
14.3 |
6 |
85.7 |
|||
|
No. of Antenatal visits during Pregnancy |
One |
13 |
6 |
46.2 |
7 |
53.8 |
7.42* |
P<0.05 (5.991) |
|
Two |
21 |
14 |
66.7 |
7 |
33.3 |
|||
|
Three and above |
26 |
7 |
26.9 |
19 |
73.1 |
|||
|
Previous knowledge |
Yes |
40 |
17 |
42.5 |
23 |
57.5 |
0.30 NS |
P>0.05 (3.841) |
|
No |
20 |
10 |
50.0 |
10 |
50.0 |
|||
|
Source of Information |
Health workers |
40 |
17 |
42.5 |
23 |
57.5 |
0.30 NS |
P>0.05 (3.841) |
|
No |
20 |
10 |
50.0 |
10 |
50.0 |
|||
|
Combined |
|
60 |
27 |
45.0 |
33 |
55.0 |
|
|
* Significant at 5% Level, NS : Non-significant
The above table-10 revealed that there is a significant association in the category of gestation age of pregnancy and number of antenatal visits during pregnancy whereas in the category of first ANC registration, previous knowledge and source of information were found to be not significant with selected demographic variables.
CONCLUSION:
The study clearly indicates that the parenthood program should be a part and partial as a community oriented with the curriculum and should be inculcates at the starting. Hence, there is a need of awareness program among the community people to know about the importance of planned parenthood and its benefits beforehand.
REFERENCES:
1. Jacob A. A comprehensive Text Book of Midwifery. 3rd Ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers. 2012.
2. Onayade, A. A., Okanbi, O. O., Okunola, H. A., Oyeniyi, C. F., Togun, O. O. and Sule, S. S. Birth preparedness and emergency readiness plans of antenatal clinic attendees in ile-ife, Nigeria. The Nigerian Postgaduate Medical Journal. 2010; 17(1): 30 – 39.
3. International Institute of Population Services (IIPS) and Macro International. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2) 1998-99. Mumbai and Calverton, 2000. IIPS, 2000
|
Received on 14.05.2025 Revised on 24.06.2025 Accepted on 23.07.2025 Published on 13.08.2025 Available online from August 20, 2025 Asian J. Nursing Education and Research. 2025;15(3):177-180. DOI: 10.52711/2349-2996.2025.00037 ©A and V Publications All right reserved
|
|
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License. |
|