A comparative study was conducted in selected schools of nursing among students on the care of client with hemodialysis with one group pre-test; post-test design.
The aims of the study were
1. To assess the level of knowledge regarding the care of client with hemodialysis among students as measured by structured questionnaire.
2. To prepare and administer the teaching strategies namely computer assisted learning and lecture method learning.
3. To evaluate the efficacy of teaching strategies among students in terms of gain in knowledge.
4. To compare the outcome of two teaching strategies in terms of knowledge.
The structured questionnaire was used to assess the level of knowledge regarding the care of client with hemodialysis among nursing students. Computer assisted learning and lecture method learning delivered after the pre-test to two different groups. Then post-test was conducted with the interval of seven days to assess the level of gain in knowledge score on the same group. In these two different groups of 30 subjects, there was significant increase in the post-test knowledge score in computer assisted learning and lecture method. The gain in knowledge score was statistically significant at p*>0.05 level and calculated unpaired ‘t’=4.38. Result findings, revealed that computer assisted learning was effective to enhance the knowledge of subjects on the care of client with hemodialysis.
Cite this article:
Sadiq Ahmed Shaikh. A Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Two Teaching Strategies on the care of client with Hemodialysis in terms of Knowledge among the students of selected schools of Nursing, Belgaum District. Karnataka. Asian Journal of Nursing Education and Research. 2022; 12(2):187-0. doi: 10.52711/2349-2996.2022.00037
Sadiq Ahmed Shaikh. A Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Two Teaching Strategies on the care of client with Hemodialysis in terms of Knowledge among the students of selected schools of Nursing, Belgaum District. Karnataka. Asian Journal of Nursing Education and Research. 2022; 12(2):187-0. doi: 10.52711/2349-2996.2022.00037 Available on: https://ajner.com/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2022-12-2-6
1. Loretta E, Heidgerken. Teaching and learning in schools of nursing, 3rd edition. Philadelphia : JB Lippincott, 2001 :p 415.
2. Clifford T M, Richard AK, John RW and John S. Introduction to psychology, congress cataloguing Publication : New Delhi, 1986 : p140.
3. Neeraja KP. Text book of nursing education. New Delhi : Jaypee Brother Medical Publication; 2003 : p327.
4. Moronha JA. The effectiveness of teaching through computer programme in pregnancy. Journal of Obstetrics 2004; 5(1) : 29-36.
5. Patrick GW, Alan BR, Darracott E, Vaughan and Alan JW. Campbells Urology, 8th Edition, Philadelphia : W. B Saunders; 2000 : p287.
6. Allen RN and Richard NF. Dialysis therapy 3rd edition, New Delhi : Elsevier; p2.
7. Anderson spickard. Jabil Alrajesh. Learning about screening using an online computer assisted learning comparing to lecture method. www.vandubit.edu. Nov. 2006
8. Trisha greenhalgh. Computer assisted learning in undergraduate medical education. JAMA 2006; 10 : 250-255.
9. Mark W. Hendwick. Lecture method of presentation. The University of Minnesota 1997; 7(9) : 40-42.
10. Barbara Kozier, Glenora erb, Audrey Berman and Shirlee Snyder. Fundamentals of Nursing, 7th editon, New Delhi; Pearson education : 2004, p187.
11. Cooper V. Designing Computer based learning materials. Gower http ://www. Ich.hw. ac. UK dit / coon book / info learning (16 Nov 2006)
12. Cynthia Lanius. Computer assisted learning in class room www.cellbioed. Org / discussion / public / main.cfm (16 Nov 2006).
13. R.W. P. Luk and A. B. Y. Ng. computer assisted learning of Chinese. Idioms. Hong Kong Polytechnic university 2006; 12: p 650.
14. Martin Schittek and Nikos Mattheos. Computer assisted learning. A review The open university and school of education, de montfort university 2007; 11 : p 410.
15. M. Adnanes and W. M. Running computer networks in education – a better way to learn. The Norwegian university of sciences and technology, Norway, 1997; 10(3) p 225.
16. N. Adam and M. Wild. Computer support of effective peer assessment in an undergraduate programming class active learning is considered by many academics as an important and effective learning strategy. University of Edith cowan. 2006; 10 : p 180.
17. Crook C. Deferring to resources: Collaboration around tradiational Vs computer based notes. Loughborough University 2007; 14 : p 195.
18. Eleans R C and Omaha Boy N H Abandoning the lecture in biology. Journal of excellence in college teaching 1997; 7(3) : 93-110.
19. Marilyn E Gist. The influence of training method on self efficacy and idea generation among managers. University of Washington 2001; 16(8) : 95-99.
20. Morrison and Diane Elizabeth. Opening doors to better teaching. The role of peer based instructional consultation. The Claremout graduation school 1995; 56(06) : p 2134.
21. White, Mary Jean. Relationship between teaching method and student achievement in technical college introduction to micro computer courses Auburn University 1995; 56 (5) p 1751.
22. Ferrell, Mitzi Janu. How three instructors conceptions about mathematics and mathematics teaching relate to their instructional practices. Arizona state university 1995; 56(5) : p1642.
23. Stephens, Jan Ellen. Effectiveness of supplemental instruction and developmental math students in higher education North Texas state university 1995; 56(5) : p 1697.
24. Philip K. Piele. Teaching faculty attitudes and beliefs about the implementation of interactive television and computer mediated conferencing as distance education media eastern Oregon state college. University of Oregon 1995; 56(5) : p 1677.
25. Mc Govern, Mary Carol W. The effect of developmental instruction strategies on the cognitive development of sophomore nursing students. Temple University 1995; 56(4) : p 1262.
26. Bello Haas, Vanina Dal, Susan and Ekelman. The effectives of the feedback lecture with the traditional method. Journal of Physical therapy education. 2000; 6(2) : 8-10.
27. Ouwendyk M Leitch R Daily hemodialysis. A nursing perspective Advances in renal replacement therapy 2001; 8 : 257-267.
28. Christopher R. Blagg Why thrice weekly dialysis ?. Hemodialysis International 2004; 8 : 188-192.
29. Perl J Unruch M. L. and Chan C. T. Sleep disorders in end stage renal disease. Markers of inadequate dialysis ? Kidney Internatioan 2006; 70 : 1687-1693.