Pregnancy is perceived as a miracle. Many women feel an inner glow and bond to the growing foetus. Instead most of the expectant mothers were experiencing gestational diabetes mellitus at present during their pregnancy that leads to many complications to the mother and the foetus. So the investigator has selected this study to maintain blood glucose level within normal limit and to prevent complications to the mother and foetus. A quantitative approach - non experimental evaluative research design was used. Data were collected from 30 samples by non probability purposive sampling technique. Descriptive and inferential statistics was used to analyze the data. The study findings revealed that among 30 samples, 14 (46.7%) were belongs to the age group of 25 - 31 years, 14 (46.7%) were illiterate, 13 (43.45%) were home maker, 18 (60.0%) were belongs to monthly income of RS. 3001 and above, 17(56.6%) were non vegetarian, 17 (56.6%) were primigravida, 15(50.0%) were belongs to the gestational age of 29 to 42 weeks, 17 (56.7%) were family history of diabetes mellitus, 15 (50.0) were obtained information through mass media. After nursing care 26 (86.6%) had good glycaemia control, 4 (13.4%) had moderate glycaemia control. Through this study the investigator has found that there is significant association between the age in years, occupation, family income, dietary pattern, gestational age and family history of diabetes mellitus.
Cite this article:
Lakshmi. K. Effectiveness of Nursing care of antenatal mothers with Gestational diabetes mellitus. Asian J. Nursing Education and Research. 2020; 10(3): 286-290. doi: 10.5958/2349-2996.2020.00060.9
1. Dutta D.C “Text Book of Obstetrics Including Perinatology and Contraception” 9th Edition, Jaypee Publications, 2018.
2. International Diabetes Federation, IDF Diabetes atlas.7th ed, Brussels, Belgium. International Diabetes Federation 2017.
3. Sreekanthank, Belicita A, Rajendran K, vijayakumara, Prevalence of GDM in a Medical College in South India. A Pilot Study Indian J Clin Pract 2014; 25:342- 7.
4. Raja M, et al. A study to estimate the prevalence of GDM in an urban block of Kashmir Valley. Int J Med Sci Public Health 2014; 3: 191.
5. Bhatt AA, et al. GDM in rural population of western India – result of community survey. Indian Journal Endocrinology Metabolic 2015; 19; 507 -10.
6. Mahalakshmi MM, et al. Comparison of maternal and foetal outcomes among asian Indian pregnant women with/or without GDM. A Situational analysis study. Indian J Endocrinology Metab 2016; 20: 491 -6.
7. Diabetes News Journal 2015 April 14.
8. Lowdermilk, Perry “Maternity and Women’s Health Care” 11th Edition, Philadelphia, Mosby, Elsevier Publication, 2016.
9. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2010; 33:676–682.
10. Bellamy L, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2009; 373:1773–1779.
11. Clausen TD, et al. High prevalence of type 2 diabetes and prediabetes in adult offspring of women with gestational diabetes mellitus or type 1 diabetes: the role of intrauterine hyperglycemia. Diabetes Care. 2008; 31:340–346.
12. Seshiah V, Balaji V, Balaji MS, Sanjeevi CB, Green A. Gestational diabetes mellitus in India. J Assoc Physicians India 2004; 52:707-11.
13. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel, Metzger BE, et al. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care 2010; 33:676-82.