Nidhi Tripathi, Rashmi P. John, Pravesh Vishwakarma
Nidhi Tripathi1, Mrs. Rashmi P. John2, Dr. Pravesh Vishwakarma3
1M.Sc. Nursing (Cardio-vascular and Thoracic Nursing) KGMU College of Nursing, Lucknow, India
2Head of Medical Surgical Nursing, Principal College of Nursing, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, India
3Associate Professor, Department of Cardiology, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, India
Volume - 11,
Issue - 1,
Year - 2021
Background: Pacemaker is a recommended therapy for treating the problems with the flow of electrical impulses in the heart, called arrhythmias, which is a general term meaning “there is an abnormality within the pattern of conduction or electrical rhythm.” Permanent pacemakers have significantly increased survival and improved quality of life for many patients with bradyarrhythmia. In India, about 1,00,000 patients suffer from bradycardia per annum. However, only 20,000 patients resort to pacemakers annually as meant for life time use but a number of them don’t have sufficient knowledge about living with a pacemaker which unintentionally leads to negligence of pacemaker home care management and further cause many direct and indirect life-threatening complications. However, lack of knowledge or misinformation in patients may end in self-imposed which can adversely affect ordinary day-to-day activities, especially when the patient discharged from the hospital after pacemaker implantation. Therefore, interested to require up the study to enhance patient’s knowledge. Objective: The study aims was to evaluate the efficacy of Information Booklet regarding home care management on knowledge among patients with permanent pacemaker. Methods: A quasi-experimental design was considered for this study. Total 97 samples were taken (one group pretest post-test design) from Cath Lab of LARI Cardiology Centre, department of cardiology of King George’s Medical University, Lucknow by purposive sampling technique. Information Booklet was developed regarding home care management of permanent pacemaker and given to the patients after pretest. Tools used were socio-demographic profile and self-structured knowledge questionnaire. Pre-test and post-test method used to test efficacy. Pre-test was done at first day of post -permanent pacemaker implantation and post-test was done after 2 weeks on patient’s first follow-up visit. Results: The present study revealed that initially a large proportion 52.6 % subjects had knowledge score below 40 % (poor level of knowledge) which after post-test improved and only 18.5 % left in poor category however 26.9 % reached to the good level of knowledge and 2.1 % was in excellent category even there was no patient in this category in pretest and only 2.1 % had good level of knowledge in pretest. On comparison of pre-test and post-test knowledge scores there were significant improvement seen in mean knowledge score of the post-test 13.05±3.82 as compared to the pre-test 9.01±3.10. The increase in mean score was highly significant at p<0.001. Discussion: In the present study, Information Booklet regarding home care management was found effective in term of increasing knowledge of patients with permanent pacemaker and was helpful to made them independent in their activities of daily living. Therefore, such should be taught to the patients to improve pacemaker home care management, so that patient can adopt the changes made after pacemaker implantation which help to reduce the pacemaker related complications and prevent the chances of pacemaker’s malfunctioning.
Cite this article:
Nidhi Tripathi, Rashmi P. John, Pravesh Vishwakarma. Efficacy of Information Booklet regarding Home Care Management on Knowledge among Patients with Permanent Pacemaker. Asian J. Nursing Education and Research. 2021; 11(1):31-40. doi: 10.5958/2349-2996.2021.00009.4
1. Dake S, Dias R Effectiveness of Information Booklet regarding Home Care of Pacemaker among the Patients with Complete Heart Block from. Indian Journal of Science and Research. 2014; 77 (1): 77-83
2. Bhamri, N.: “New Generation Pacemakers”, (2017). Available from: https://www.maxhealthcare.in/blogs/cardiac-sciencescardiology/new-generation-pacemakers.
3. Ebraheem S H Assessment of Quality of Life among Adult cardiac Patients with a Permanent Cardiac Pacing”, At Manial University and hospital Unpublished thesis for Master degree, Faculty of Nursing, Cairo, 2002:130-133
4. Olshansky B. and Hayes D. L. Patient information: Pacemakers: Beyond the Basics. Wolters Kluer Health; Up to Date; (2015): Available from: http://www.uptodate.com/contents/pacemakersbeyond-the-basics.
5. Chapagai1 Swaty, G Rachel Andrews, Naik Nitish: A Study to Assess the Knowledge and Quality of Life of Pacemaker Patients with a view to Develop an Information Booklet. from Asian J. Nur. Edu. and Research.2017; 7(1): 108-114.
6. Vijayaraman P, Ellenbogen KA. Bradyarrhythmia’s and pacemakers. In: V Fuster ed. Hurst’s The Heart. New York: 2011: 13th ed. McGraw-Hill Medical: pp 398-420.
7. Hayes DL, Zipes D.P. Cardiac Pacemakers and Cardioverter Defibrillators. In: Libby P, Bonow RO, Mann DL, Zipes DP. Braunwald’s Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2008; 8th ed pp.831-846.
8. Snegalatha D, Anand J, Seetharaman B, John B. Knowledge and attitude regarding permanent pacemaker and the quality of life of patients after permanent pacemaker implantation. from Indian J Cont Nsg Edn 2019; 20:33-9.
9. Lopez AD, Murray CC. The global burden of disease, 1990-2020. Nat Med 1998; 4:1241-3. Available from: https://www.ncbinlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9809543
10. Aredes AF, Lucianeli JG, Dias MF, Bragada VCA, Dumbra APP, Pompeo DA. “Knowledge of patients undergoing implantation of permanent cardiac pacemaker on the main home care”. Relampa. 2010;23(1):28-35
11. Science museum. Exploring the history of medicine [Internet]. [cited 2019, June10]. Available from: http://broughttolife.sciencemuseum.org.uk/broughttolife/techniques/ pacemaker
12. Gandhi T., Crawford T. and Riddell J.: Cardiovascular implantable electronic device associated infections. 2012: Infect Dis Clin North Am; 26(1): 57-76.
13. Altman, Lawrence H W, “Larsson. Had First Internal Pacemaker”. New York Times. [Internet]. 2002 [cited 2019 June,10]: Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Artificial_ cardiac_ pacemaker.
14. Mehra R. Koehler J. Incidence of complete heart block and cost effectiveness of pacemaker therapy in India. 2008
15. Lewis S L, Heitkemper M M, Dirksen S. R, Bucher L. Medical Surgical Nursing; Assessment and management of client problems. 9thed. Mosby Company; 2010.
16. Brunner L, Suddarth D, Smeltzer S, Bare B. Brunner and Suddarth's textbook of medical-surgical nursing. 10th ed. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott; 2014
17. Shenthar J P, Jetley V, Bohra S, Vora A, Lokhandwala Y, Nabar A et al. A survey of cardiac implantable electronic device implantation in India: By Indian Society of Electro cardiology and Indian Heart Rhythm Society. Indian Heart Journal.2016; 68(1)
18. Gregoratos G: Indications and Recommendations for Pacemaker Therapy. American Academy of Family Physicians. 2005;71: 1563-70.
19. Rajgopal S, Kapoor A, Bajaj R, Vora A, Sethi K, Sinha N et al. CSI/IHRS practice guidelines on follow-up of patients with permanent pacemakers. Indian Heart Journal. 2012;64(S2): S12-S17.
20. Living with your pacemaker. American Heart Association. [Internet]. 2016 [Cited 2019, Oct.06] available from: https://www.heart.org/en/health-topics/arrhythmia/prevention--treatment-of-arrhythmia/living-with-your pacemaker
21. Hana, Youssef A, Ebtisam, Abd El-aal M. Home Care for Patients with Permanent Pacemaker Insertion. Journal of Nursing and Health Science. 2017;6(4); 49-57.
22. Findikoglu G, Yildiz B S, Sanlialp M, Alihanoglu Y I, Kilic I D, Evregul H et al. Limitation of motion and shoulder disabilities in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Int J Rehabil Res. 2015;38(4):28793.
23. Malm D, Karlsson J E, Fridlund B. Effects of a self-care program on the health-related quality of life of pacemaker patients: a nursing intervention study. Can J S Cardiovasc Nurs. 2007;17(1):15-26.
24. Russell C L,Alyn I B. Living with a permanent cardiac pacemaker. Heart Lung .2007;2:273-279.
25. Malm D, Hallberg LR. Patients’ experiences of daily living with a pacemaker: a grounded theory study. Jernel of Health Psychol 2006; 11:787-798.
26. Stewart JV, Sheehan AM. Permanent pacemakers: the nurse's role in patient education and follow-up care. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 1991;5(3):32-4
27. Marwa Abd, Elkreem Ibrahim. Effect of Teaching Instructions on Mother’ Knowledge and Selected Outcomes among Their Children Having Permanent Pacemaker from. iosrjournals.2018:72-82
28. Aya Abd Elnaser Mohamed ‘Effectiveness of Educational Program on Knowledge and Practice of Patients Undergoing Permanent Pacemaker. iosrjournals 2016.72-83
29. Ghojazadeh M., Aghdash S., Navi Z., et al. cardiovascular patient’s experiences of living with pacemaker. ARYA Atherosclerosis.11(5):281-288
30. Nasr M., Ganzory G., Ahmed M., Impact of counseling program on Knowledge and self-efficacy of patients withimplanted permanent pacemaker. J Am Sci 2015;11(6):297-306.
31. Timby and Smith. Effectiveness of educational program on knowledge and practice of patients undergoing permanent pacemaker, IOSR Journal of Nursing and Health Science. 2010. 5(6): 72-83.
32. Elsalam A, Shafy A, Rahim A. Effect of an educational program on the performance of nurses working with cardiac patients. [Internet]. 2010 [Cited 2019, Oct.06] available from: http://drepository.asu.edu.eg/xmlui/bitstream/handle
33. Nagwa Mohamed Ahmed Mohamed and Zienab Abd El-Lateef Mohamed. Impact of Nursing Teaching Protocol on reduction of Complications for Patient with Permanent Artificial Pacemaker. J Am Sci 2014;10(11):122-130.
34. Woods S L, Sivarajan Froelicher E S, Motzer S U, and Bridges E J: Cardiac Nursing, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Sydney.2005; 5th ed: pp. 709-738.
35. El-dein,G., Kishk, Y., Mohamed, W. and Mohamed Z.: Permanent artificial pacemaker: impact of a designed nursing intervention protocol on patient's knowledge, skills as well as prevention of complications, AAMJ 2007, 5(1): 193-203.